{"id":"W1964571494","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.11.004","title":"Motivating energy conservation in the workplace: An evaluation of the use of group-level feedback and peer education","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":485,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Vanderbilt University","keywords":"Psychological intervention; Incentive; Energy conservation; Environmental economics; Energy consumption; Dissemination; Business; Control (management); Energy (signal processing); Efficient energy use; Greenhouse gas; Psychology; Peer review; Peer group; Public relations; Applied psychology; Engineering; Social psychology; Economics; Political science; Management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001918932,0.00009861401,0.00013364,0.00004866169,0.00006189557,0.00001098981,0.0002564157,0.00009260866,0.0008127459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002348938,0.00006570473,0.00005165422,0.0001359672,0.0005983184,0.0004004653,0.00006266108,0.0002703092,0.000001560293],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001369882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002696138,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001599014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002193707,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980769,0.0005259312,0.00050454,0.0001605617,0.0006198392,0.0001122784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989341,0.0001304755,0.0005544627,0.0003195067,0.00001554788,0.00004591656],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005461273,0.001247488,0.8550466,0.000004200557,0.000007037423,2.038765e-7,0.001808532,0.0003799616,0.0961527,0.0001230248,0.0008428565,0.04433282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004917539,0.0001147351,0.9922953,0.000007835049,0.0000244761,0.0000473747,0.002224361,0.0002588684,0.0005004354,0.001310452,0.002665406,0.00005900694],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969102,0.00002761563,0.00005143313,0.002160843,0.0002904522,0.000193882,0.00000448748,7.539986e-7,0.000360386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974329,0.00002305993,0.001290363,0.001104246,0.00003220885,0.000007907697,0.000005016319,0.00000714338,0.00009709791],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1372487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8898998,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05574451335492457,"score_gpt":0.330123366190288,"score_spread":0.2743788528353635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}