{"id":"W1964590145","doi":"10.1080/01615440009598964","title":"Measuring Fertility with the 1901 Canadian Census: A Critical Assessment","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Historical Methods A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History","topic":"Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Quebec Statistical Institute; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Census; Fertility; Geography; Demography; Sociology; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02890146,0.0008894684,0.0006403578,0.01452606,0.007764363,0.003671931,0.003938764,0.0008834603,0.004621152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09474897,0.0008675448,0.000716891,0.01935547,0.003474525,0.002086487,0.001847243,0.001947135,0.0005366305],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1002261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1614258,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9919226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962416,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9859782,0.002425767,0.0008430537,0.0006387435,0.009270815,0.0008433489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8848844,0.008609656,0.002431087,0.002678974,0.09923784,0.002158001],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002067484,0.00005630957,0.2500822,0.002909003,0.0002387514,0.0002416426,0.007346195,0.001037406,0.0009905482,0.01489274,0.3439361,0.3780623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002965551,0.00005770964,0.5215548,0.004083404,0.0004361673,0.0001911774,0.01213259,0.001695706,0.001481678,0.0020841,0.4560574,0.0001956286],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1978922,0.2015777,0.04328253,0.2158179,0.01595121,0.009902951,0.1002535,0.001446128,0.2138759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7554554,0.08374348,0.09528837,0.01423244,0.001988402,0.002669828,0.01370186,0.0003889494,0.03253128],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1002261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7271949,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.184129352805154,"score_gpt":0.4378214476679274,"score_spread":0.2536920948627734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}