{"id":"W1964593541","doi":"10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.09.008","title":"Studies of potential sources that contributed to atmospheric mercury in Toronto, Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Atmospheric Environment","topic":"Mercury impact and mitigation studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Mercury (programming language); Coal combustion products; Environmental science; Environmental chemistry; Ozone; Air pollution; Pollutant; Emission inventory; NOx; Combustion; Atmospheric chemistry; Elemental mercury; Atmospheric sciences; Chemistry; Meteorology; Flue gas; Geography; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002063996,0.0002728924,0.000454646,9.962592e-7,0.0001104902,0.000009199851,0.0002350163,0.00005321237,0.002914536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004276308,0.0002410758,0.00006615907,0.0001713382,0.0001463952,0.0001777244,0.0001785188,0.00008142168,0.00005893328],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001699228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002922929,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2220372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1857038,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980165,0.00007423634,0.0004285306,0.0003807092,0.000621621,0.0004783934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992759,0.00005896441,0.0001637319,0.0003117195,0.000006129866,0.0001835036],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002807093,0.0008761045,0.679867,0.00004261342,0.0004257205,0.0001544584,0.009258457,0.1469689,0.02536556,0.0001331006,0.05141436,0.08521307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008128723,0.0003497972,0.9605579,0.00003328358,0.00005426749,0.00000580107,0.007014748,0.00049057,0.002147964,0.0001028892,0.0279489,0.0004809482],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9923034,0.003279229,0.0005049397,0.001324419,0.0001702248,0.0004216395,0.00001064194,0.00002013946,0.001965316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929366,0.001004077,0.003941952,0.001268147,0.00002711763,0.00003050808,0.000004518407,0.00001341174,0.0007737002],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.280691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979969,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01000464037808281,"score_gpt":0.2386183709611091,"score_spread":0.2286137305830263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}