{"id":"W1964593541","doi":"10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.09.008","title":"Studies of potential sources that contributed to atmospheric mercury in Toronto, Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Atmospheric Environment","topic":"Mercury impact and mitigation studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Mercury (programming language); Coal combustion products; Environmental science; Environmental chemistry; Ozone; Air pollution; Pollutant; Emission inventory; NOx; Combustion; Atmospheric chemistry; Elemental mercury; Atmospheric sciences; Chemistry; Meteorology; Flue gas; Geography; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005108723,0.0003192846,0.0002299375,0.001682836,0.006263103,0.001379801,0.0007673198,0.0003530474,0.002327896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001223231,0.0003000076,0.0002947384,0.004181102,0.0007316306,0.0003868782,0.0008348373,0.0005126985,0.000142799],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0559228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05339358,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9982923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995694,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993326,0.00007626134,0.00003670016,0.000077934,0.0002914922,0.0001849188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987609,0.0001067451,0.000137916,0.00002275631,0.0008273943,0.0001443071],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005896502,0.0001698226,0.8691662,0.00102839,0.0003231586,0.002311625,0.04104735,0.001459555,0.00837942,0.004043536,0.01161571,0.05986566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001347314,0.00006252875,0.9596531,0.000131567,0.00008709619,0.0001440636,0.02216274,0.0003779254,0.001651499,0.0001162288,0.01557158,0.00002824821],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.972096,0.003637473,0.0003635588,0.0014224,0.00003538457,0.0001301287,0.002874327,0.0000207915,0.01942003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868016,0.002658198,0.0005252321,0.0002028738,0.00001005974,0.00002572699,0.0004938736,0.000007609105,0.009274728],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0559228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4057502,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01000464037808281,"score_gpt":0.2386183709611091,"score_spread":0.2286137305830263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}