{"id":"W1964627011","doi":"10.1177/0959354309103535","title":"Holzkamp's Critical Psychology as a Science from the Standpoint of the Human Subject","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory & Psychology","topic":"Social Representations and Identity","field":"Psychology","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Epistemology; Object (grammar); Context (archaeology); Psychology of science; Subject matter; Action (physics); Psychological science; Psychology; Psychological research; Sociology; Cognitive science; Social psychology; Philosophy; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001989112,0.0001978717,0.0003126487,0.0001192802,0.0007078374,0.00004894111,0.001674609,0.0002031995,0.004358244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009464309,0.0001272953,0.0002103521,0.0008407804,0.004381062,0.000115497,0.0001183017,0.0005221272,0.0003946406],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003680066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008391515,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004229152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005786104,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9965469,0.00134284,0.0004900632,0.0006819774,0.0003671709,0.0005710047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968382,0.0008821758,0.0001920059,0.001798222,0.0001898745,0.00009957487],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002712495,0.0005019484,0.006913455,9.952998e-7,0.00005294228,0.00001268158,0.004483917,2.820063e-7,0.03010675,0.9375193,0.009889123,0.0102474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000489804,0.0002070705,0.4897527,0.000006545812,0.00003523974,0.00002904325,0.0008426693,2.232494e-7,0.0003193209,0.5068729,0.001355631,0.00008888465],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7992647,0.0004338217,0.0006606454,0.00864996,0.002310568,0.000288694,0.0000251776,0.00005153383,0.1883149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883268,0.0000180602,0.00006710156,0.01055743,0.0003356753,0.00002594591,0.000003198572,0.00001701957,0.0006487286],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4828393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983284,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04650255786726285,"score_gpt":0.4783030285376355,"score_spread":0.4318004706703726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}