{"id":"W1964690534","doi":"10.1016/j.jallcom.2005.11.097","title":"Field intensity factors of a penny-shaped crack in a magnetoelectroelastic layer","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Alloys and Compounds","topic":"Numerical methods in engineering","field":"Engineering","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Intensity (physics); Field (mathematics); Layer (electronics); Materials science; Field intensity; Penny; Mechanics; Condensed matter physics; Composite material; Engineering physics; Physics; Optics; Mathematics; Nuclear magnetic resonance; History","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003602895,0.0001063349,0.0003149209,0.0001811785,0.00001021457,0.00001172385,0.0001028436,0.00006066327,0.00001877342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001354183,0.0000910305,0.00006327575,0.0001722115,0.00001837677,0.00008816078,0.0000218685,0.0003601081,2.963782e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004226186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008400232,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001049925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001193813,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991968,0.00001293274,0.0004102489,0.00005613063,0.0001347399,0.0001891822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993511,0.0003617334,0.00007448287,0.00006768665,0.00006062218,0.00008432726],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006592423,0.0002529687,0.1229966,0.0004783589,0.0003566083,0.0003576321,0.002084087,0.0124802,0.8355326,0.0007207714,0.0006485381,0.02343234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003148543,0.004031443,0.767577,0.0007633386,0.0001651534,0.0008959583,0.001134766,0.1102343,0.1015314,0.005195312,0.004271642,0.001051088],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8756801,0.0003441434,0.123154,0.00002550853,0.0002974723,0.00002588034,3.000865e-7,0.0000132662,0.000459309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858225,0.00006844036,0.0139964,0.00002393509,0.00006444945,1.942984e-7,1.133054e-7,0.00001337845,0.00001061355],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7340012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3712116,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01407429069730301,"score_gpt":0.2519932669298584,"score_spread":0.2379189762325554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}