{"id":"W1964699300","doi":"10.1007/s10979-008-9151-y","title":"Investigating investigators: How presentation order influences participant–investigators’ interpretations of eyewitness identification and alibi evidence.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Human Behavior","topic":"Radiology practices and education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Okanagan College","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Alibi; Suspect; Psychology; Witness; Eyewitness identification; Suggestibility; Presentation (obstetrics); Eyewitness memory; Social psychology; Eyewitness testimony; Legal psychology; Cognitive psychology; Criminology; Relation (database); Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0178693,0.0004567594,0.0003905324,0.0004299919,0.0008308985,0.002383253,0.0005797662,0.001198704,0.003983244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1684126,0.0006262428,0.0002515681,0.0002383841,0.001308154,0.002600285,0.001319622,0.001133284,0.0004374087],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008135076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001184564,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000630102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001300123,"domain_scores_codex":[0.984353,0.01165209,0.0009070276,0.001174032,0.001486487,0.000427289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7999108,0.1714581,0.01953356,0.004303162,0.003150958,0.001643411],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.05505311,0.01143355,0.2372649,0.001823344,0.0005390134,0.001653056,0.1312463,0.002836161,0.3942704,0.005961634,0.001787487,0.156131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01064513,0.0580679,0.6207737,0.0008707254,0.001629998,0.002495828,0.03698479,0.02560066,0.192337,0.03109824,0.01875326,0.0007427087],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947896,0.0001159852,0.0025157,0.0002272982,0.00003697499,0.0002231958,0.00003047845,0.00002772343,0.00203297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927187,0.0001059751,0.006025781,0.0001426622,0.00003430501,0.0002704966,0.00003045522,0.00002213665,0.0006494742],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0178693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09450299,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1762653193987168,"score_gpt":0.3949731348160118,"score_spread":0.218707815417295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}