{"id":"W1964714699","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.03.003","title":"Power and perceptions in participatory monitoring and evaluation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evaluation and Program Planning","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Accountability; Citizen journalism; Participatory evaluation; Bureaucracy; Perception; Power (physics); Participatory action research; Participant observation; Participatory design; Public relations; Politics; Psychology; Business; Political science; Economic growth; Sociology; Engineering; Public administration; Operations management; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"opus","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1002639,0.0005997113,0.0007143031,0.004118698,0.006785309,0.01023185,0.001677521,0.002691971,0.004238421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2535814,0.0009625793,0.000527111,0.001785918,0.03011424,0.01144113,0.007974057,0.003693295,0.0002446481],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005373244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005724425,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00630914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004946845,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8769285,0.1012508,0.002260742,0.003658403,0.01209824,0.003803313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5503592,0.4133493,0.01216966,0.006303097,0.01214148,0.005677104],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003598795,0.0003535741,0.03559164,0.0004776075,0.0001824198,0.0004658133,0.2736695,0.002822379,0.0008655744,0.5894498,0.002584445,0.09317736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002185293,0.0003065156,0.0246849,0.0007858288,0.0001387347,0.0002884932,0.1261871,0.008866597,0.001629862,0.8153642,0.02138527,0.0001440874],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5834897,0.002768747,0.101414,0.03706102,0.000414377,0.0004959056,0.00006322296,0.00008907885,0.2742038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972333,0.00008282228,0.00161572,0.0002331092,0.00003902555,0.00009871163,0.000004238954,0.00001117331,0.0006818964],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1002639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3716448119431371,"score_gpt":0.6018709322341447,"score_spread":0.2302261202910075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}