{"id":"W1964714699","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.03.003","title":"Power and perceptions in participatory monitoring and evaluation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evaluation and Program Planning","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Accountability; Citizen journalism; Participatory evaluation; Bureaucracy; Perception; Power (physics); Participatory action research; Participant observation; Participatory design; Public relations; Politics; Psychology; Business; Political science; Economic growth; Sociology; Engineering; Public administration; Operations management; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"opus","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0128765,0.000115235,0.0001543247,0.0002828964,0.0002260918,0.0003581114,0.00006622229,0.00006785036,0.0004304429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008250647,0.00009649183,0.00001778114,0.0003432528,0.00005574514,0.000561394,0.00002703985,0.0001335957,0.00001271745],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005056155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000105917,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004837704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007465026,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969747,0.0005224984,0.0004350315,0.0003643426,0.001510559,0.0001928355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989929,0.0002550977,0.0001238534,0.000158869,0.0003585484,0.000110684],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001347234,0.00003624601,0.3704394,0.000001671012,0.000002846629,3.997633e-7,0.005577287,0.0004962815,0.0001606826,0.0001398136,0.00006339543,0.6230686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007268778,0.0001797033,0.8164224,0.00004786882,0.00002067346,0.000004645942,0.003895731,0.1731154,0.00001900716,0.004780173,0.0006865731,0.000100963],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929388,0.001722088,0.00008028885,0.001041026,0.0001336096,0.0007384908,9.068048e-7,0.00003343163,0.003311344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982011,0.0000665777,0.001374004,0.000123376,0.00004770341,0.0001293901,0.000007619761,0.000004090185,0.00004612599],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6229676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4713047,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3716448119431371,"score_gpt":0.6018709322341447,"score_spread":0.2302261202910075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}