{"id":"W1964815143","doi":"10.1007/s10805-006-9018-0","title":"Juggling Through Hoops: Implementing Ethics Policies in Applied Language Studies","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Information ethics; Discipline; Consistency (knowledge bases); Applied ethics; Context (archaeology); Meta-ethics; Sociology; Research ethics; Nursing ethics; Ethics of technology; Normative ethics; Political science; Epistemology; Social science; Law; Computer science; Engineering; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005488714,0.0002436572,0.0006366399,0.0003106708,0.0005689012,0.0001064261,0.0004148442,0.0003048097,0.0001070447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001786187,0.0001893112,0.000193567,0.0001566276,0.0006740632,0.0003904269,0.0002054996,0.005928599,0.000009221301],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001266145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001794058,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007055608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005074183,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996902,0.0002237322,0.001303847,0.0001795936,0.0008970787,0.00049374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964141,0.00189751,0.0009843429,0.000159826,0.000511397,0.00003286702],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001381547,0.00003242294,0.0007239922,0.0001362713,0.0002778194,0.00003815847,0.6040013,0.0002342257,0.0005148276,0.3899347,0.003692602,0.0003998255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006439714,0.00005332842,0.0001585603,0.0006226767,0.0003104196,0.00001817371,0.8642588,0.00001493475,0.0009845903,0.05469384,0.0779013,0.0003394682],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7189367,0.07471369,0.0002471747,0.03300897,0.001439196,0.0002824865,0.00003549608,0.00009823812,0.171238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865178,0.004951344,0.0007668622,0.002863625,0.003683476,0.000005134079,0.000003914472,0.00003288501,0.001174934],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3352409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963648,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1525999286053652,"score_gpt":0.441410211219308,"score_spread":0.2888102826139428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}