{"id":"W1964834699","doi":"10.1103/physreva.80.053402","title":"Coherent control in the classical limit: Symmetry breaking in an optical lattice","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physical Review A","topic":"Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Physics; Quantum decoherence; Quantum mechanics; Symmetry breaking; Optical lattice; Lattice (music); Quantum; Classical limit; Quantum limit; Spontaneous symmetry breaking; Limit (mathematics); Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002314717,0.0001831948,0.0004985826,0.00001690792,0.00004737077,0.00003323978,0.0002565944,0.00002053023,0.00003237887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003936524,0.0001139755,0.0001540753,0.0003040599,0.0000784271,0.0001014141,0.00002491672,0.0004596299,0.0000301751],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003174579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000151791,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002657341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009487043,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998722,0.0001436606,0.0002814327,0.000274499,0.0002203658,0.000358081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992199,0.0003982381,0.00005600111,0.0002320955,0.00001995459,0.0000737995],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005492832,0.003262499,0.01029603,0.0001282409,0.00003147018,0.00001491585,0.000276618,0.000003850566,0.002519581,0.8936321,0.0006144501,0.08916533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008476295,0.003074761,0.3868374,0.008142784,0.0009525557,0.00001054781,0.001393736,0.01635623,0.00491327,0.5427157,0.02442638,0.002700384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9673348,0.004304336,0.0002923752,0.01320602,0.0000357046,0.0006792105,0.000006861158,0.00002593554,0.01411477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967955,0.0001214616,0.00004803359,0.002564405,0.0003847856,0.00006961871,0.000005658721,0.00000686474,0.000003618599],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3765413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4647784,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02082668395446158,"score_gpt":0.3410097507564726,"score_spread":0.320183066802011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}