{"id":"W1964838381","doi":"10.1037/a0013521","title":"Cue-interaction effects in contingency judgments using the streamed-trial procedure.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Contingency; Psychology; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008726319,0.0008903358,0.0009399041,0.0009236505,0.0006411716,0.001346741,0.001056501,0.0009133948,0.00720142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06847852,0.0008214907,0.0005563081,0.0009590033,0.001054953,0.001936356,0.001545412,0.002255031,0.0008557335],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006725019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001308148,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001378248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00339578,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9884172,0.004728904,0.0007786627,0.00154663,0.004335959,0.0001926315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9504768,0.0341414,0.004781198,0.005252396,0.004689057,0.0006592304],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01604295,0.005040782,0.01665088,0.003863527,0.0007744745,0.000417989,0.004650314,0.003434805,0.463576,0.04882941,0.01150167,0.4252173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003726253,0.01713891,0.2302571,0.0008801365,0.001167919,0.002341014,0.000846758,0.09487217,0.4783183,0.1069215,0.06249932,0.001030543],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3387143,0.00191907,0.6025999,0.000616424,0.001931721,0.009810152,0.002272556,0.003508138,0.03862781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4572933,0.000594926,0.5299775,0.000645971,0.0002113097,0.006383512,0.0005889275,0.0005981085,0.003706362],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008726319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04614973,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08696553518933035,"score_gpt":0.4199586401561175,"score_spread":0.3329931049667871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}