{"id":"W1964964291","doi":"10.1139/z04-167","title":"Fractal analysis measures habitat use at different spatial scales: an example with American marten","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Zoology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Marten; Fractal dimension; Habitat; Scale (ratio); Understory; Spatial ecology; Canopy; Ecology; Fractal analysis; Biology; Fractal; Cartography; Geography; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004401107,0.0002233652,0.0001860096,0.001748925,0.0004179679,0.0003170249,0.0001684008,0.0002086932,0.0004065752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001296369,0.00009240245,0.000212823,0.001621249,0.0005935463,0.0003396648,0.0003899734,0.0002863549,0.00004665224],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003118056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001101525,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01298875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0225742,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998475,0.0000599442,0.000006765372,0.00002721351,0.00004500935,0.00001346509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999227,0.000315074,0.0001413127,0.00007460817,0.0001626852,0.00007927712],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002533096,0.0001488893,0.8779222,0.00008723086,0.000182794,0.0005126589,0.003380196,0.002566466,0.01901762,0.001856104,0.001001014,0.09307142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003529098,0.00009060058,0.9909667,0.000008654973,0.0000260384,0.0005848355,0.000699415,0.004450699,0.001162811,0.0009871182,0.001005016,0.00001444208],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948747,0.0003597605,0.002899501,0.00007612422,0.000003588777,0.00001215171,0.00007979949,0.00001990125,0.001674445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938128,0.0001955624,0.0056236,0.00001218638,0.00000483545,0.000007463439,0.00006269249,0.000005152811,0.0002757205],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01298875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02582628,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01645334711691819,"score_gpt":0.198831191885418,"score_spread":0.1823778447684998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}