{"id":"W1964964291","doi":"10.1139/z04-167","title":"Fractal analysis measures habitat use at different spatial scales: an example with American marten","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Zoology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Marten; Fractal dimension; Habitat; Scale (ratio); Understory; Spatial ecology; Canopy; Ecology; Fractal analysis; Biology; Fractal; Cartography; Geography; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001366222,0.0001168335,0.0002771184,0.0001854376,0.0001918551,0.00002447073,0.0001992012,0.00006720422,0.0007547808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004294069,0.00009192328,0.00007898277,0.0002723037,0.0006373529,0.0002567633,0.00001660188,0.0001679137,0.00003561183],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005334204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001232087,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1754651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9835349,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990103,0.0001285387,0.0002313645,0.0001781356,0.0001435197,0.0003081786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998967,0.00005978331,0.0002317279,0.0001710421,0.00002966114,0.0005407772],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006389056,0.00002661095,0.9929112,3.762885e-7,0.0001390066,0.0001856319,0.0003385122,0.004511883,0.00008142557,0.00001322285,0.000145325,0.001582915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003655524,0.000635237,0.9977999,0.00000251469,0.0001829543,0.0001846437,0.0001365401,0.00005148779,0.00003051641,0.0001436852,0.0003549958,0.0001119115],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965891,0.00001317256,0.00207156,0.001090988,0.00009380004,0.00005143214,0.000006842226,0.000004114494,0.0000789473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982421,0.00000299076,0.0005860925,0.001035113,0.00005118832,0.000002219403,0.00001051139,0.000008502134,0.00006127138],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8080698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8300256,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01645334711691819,"score_gpt":0.198831191885418,"score_spread":0.1823778447684998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}