{"id":"W1965034523","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01180.x","title":"Evaluating feathermoss growth: a challenge to traditional methods and implications for the boreal carbon budget","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Ecology","topic":"Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bog; Boreal; Environmental science; Peat; Taiga; Primary production; Ecosystem; Physical geography; Ecology; Atmospheric sciences; Botany; Agronomy; Biology; Geography; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006836794,0.001044636,0.0008096421,0.001026169,0.0006449564,0.00150638,0.001768309,0.0006337696,0.0004882407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007759156,0.0003600513,0.0004169567,0.001128551,0.0007451852,0.001719968,0.000888893,0.0005701152,0.0002418166],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002029833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001294847,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1077841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1939834,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977424,0.000751243,0.0001192066,0.0004450112,0.0008674733,0.0000747757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943612,0.00192466,0.0007669327,0.0006926314,0.002009995,0.0002445602],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002916323,0.0001210354,0.6734934,0.0006095982,0.0004592065,0.0001738766,0.0006125151,0.04097915,0.05105282,0.001946093,0.003053078,0.2272075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003481436,0.0002386014,0.7389133,0.0002417024,0.0001413597,0.0004972824,0.001259044,0.2284931,0.01248586,0.005746849,0.01175491,0.0001931522],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.696572,0.007760793,0.2789712,0.002246085,0.0002209788,0.0002443059,0.003254881,0.002535203,0.00819442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8431856,0.0009598064,0.1537931,0.000382793,0.00006157462,0.0001052823,0.0006656299,0.000190236,0.0006559159],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1077841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2143135,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06119577112586124,"score_gpt":0.3620542186326637,"score_spread":0.3008584475068025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}