{"id":"W1965038842","doi":"10.2495/wp080271","title":"The recalcitrance of clofibric acid to microbial degradation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"WIT transactions on ecology and the environment","topic":"Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Clofibric acid; Clofibrate; Mecoprop; Chemistry; Microorganism; Biodegradation; Environmental chemistry; Biology; Biochemistry; Bacteria; Organic chemistry; MCPA; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003828319,0.0006228496,0.0003592298,0.0006486842,0.0005312217,0.001130919,0.000208414,0.001035789,0.001097364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009947427,0.000221278,0.0005110968,0.0003066144,0.000354849,0.0004606847,0.000332898,0.0006435552,0.000574632],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009358343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000564658,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005731529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004871052,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994326,0.000129774,0.00003667993,0.00008249018,0.000192287,0.0001260443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994847,0.00007211289,0.0001717759,0.00003631601,0.0001708168,0.00006417347],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001925073,0.00001691372,0.001751916,0.0002405343,0.00003814926,0.0004602211,0.00007176061,0.0003274434,0.9838465,0.0002278472,0.0002401467,0.01258605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009283092,0.0003818423,0.009211331,0.00006450593,0.00004292434,0.001803366,0.0002121379,0.0007412442,0.9751641,0.0003790222,0.0119672,0.0000230479],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9473495,0.03982859,0.006068155,0.0008244544,0.0001970506,0.00006269855,0.0004226535,0.00007379075,0.005173151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893767,0.006307606,0.00169462,0.0001548195,0.00003642136,0.00001441388,0.0003511379,0.00001747383,0.002046846],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005731529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01139635,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0137015323881277,"score_gpt":0.2211776789079201,"score_spread":0.2074761465197925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}