{"id":"W1965038842","doi":"10.2495/wp080271","title":"The recalcitrance of clofibric acid to microbial degradation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"WIT transactions on ecology and the environment","topic":"Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Clofibric acid; Clofibrate; Mecoprop; Chemistry; Microorganism; Biodegradation; Environmental chemistry; Biology; Biochemistry; Bacteria; Organic chemistry; MCPA; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002198058,0.0001162025,0.0001275032,0.00001357299,0.0006047211,0.000005135583,0.0001532343,0.00005158608,0.0005541816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000631041,0.00006685696,0.00005953592,0.00007193061,0.001408588,0.00005975067,0.00001914893,0.000149167,0.0003620035],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006519691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003057458,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002217428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002448615,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991361,0.0001113485,0.0001883201,0.0002007663,0.0001432207,0.000220263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995066,0.0001604046,0.00004758698,0.0001903709,6.646354e-7,0.0000943978],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004670336,0.003210543,0.0487794,0.00003277902,0.0005069646,0.0000405979,0.003769988,0.07072149,0.6482913,0.002060535,0.001783996,0.2161321],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003920596,0.0007827058,0.6655089,0.00001685315,0.0001432636,0.000160906,0.0001523482,0.001013557,0.2977586,0.0009353739,0.02918803,0.0004188851],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9835718,0.00007379564,0.01019248,0.004636256,0.000114291,0.0003804846,0.000008775834,0.000009750423,0.001012337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963133,0.001039045,0.0003470591,0.0008286556,0.000008660235,0.00001813506,9.237102e-7,0.000007349769,0.001436856],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6167295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6067899,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0137015323881277,"score_gpt":0.2211776789079201,"score_spread":0.2074761465197925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}