{"id":"W1965041494","doi":"10.1139/z02-052","title":"Genetic fragmentation of populations of the fluvial sculpin<i>Cottus nozawae</i>(Pisces: Cottidae) at the southern margin of its native range","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Zoology","topic":"Fish Biology and Ecology Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sculpin; Cottidae; Cottus; Biology; Range (aeronautics); Tributary; Ecology; Population; Genetic divergence; Population fragmentation; Fluvial; Zoology; Gene flow; Genetic variation; Genetic diversity; Fishery; Geography; Paleontology; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001559589,0.0002321302,0.0002130124,0.000962966,0.0004123556,0.0003559657,0.0001855607,0.000191495,0.0003836052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004234518,0.0001743713,0.000136902,0.0005404243,0.0006407245,0.000176934,0.0003755802,0.0001572206,0.00005753872],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002169284,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02483685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07464217,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998816,0.0000195454,0.00001021359,0.000046014,0.00001731641,0.0000252429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996834,0.00004283891,0.0001359106,0.00001818466,0.00004184551,0.00007792761],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001511219,0.00004184391,0.9742968,0.00002599704,0.00007105329,0.0002090618,0.00122723,0.0001432713,0.0193458,0.00004634421,0.00002910609,0.004412302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002817411,0.00003341477,0.9994742,0.000001900465,0.000006709028,0.00005832138,0.000211648,0.00008094936,0.00008948817,0.000005929924,0.00003294699,0.000001638596],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9999079,0.00001577296,0.00001517774,0.00000137343,2.140663e-7,0.000001259534,0.000009408625,3.748835e-7,0.00004856955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998092,0.0000219261,0.00004846384,0.000003396257,6.428982e-7,0.000003488495,0.00007287611,3.8698e-7,0.00003965876],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02483685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04938453,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02972621342873373,"score_gpt":0.2033563543192551,"score_spread":0.1736301408905214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}