{"id":"W1965231589","doi":"10.2202/1557-4679.1216","title":"Estimation of Modified Concordance Ratio in Sib-Pairs: Effect of Consanguinity on the Risk of Congenital Heart Diseases","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Biostatistics","topic":"Genetic Associations and Epidemiology","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Consanguinity; Concordance; Confidence interval; Statistics; Demography; Population; Sample (material); Sample size determination; Inference; Estimation; Econometrics; Medicine; Genetics; Mathematics; Biology; Computer science; Environmental health","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008931729,0.00007142091,0.0001953058,0.00004422454,0.00002134926,0.000004771145,0.0002606533,0.00005343574,0.00001415865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00499824,0.00004213563,0.00008824978,0.00004147229,0.0002350659,0.000003067126,0.00003626355,0.0001434612,5.939173e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009467633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009516617,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007210214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006286753,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989149,0.0002633592,0.0004993869,0.00006135857,0.0001970043,0.00006399872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974473,0.001233551,0.0008049832,0.0001358012,0.0003570018,0.0000214126],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00235779,0.0004633428,0.4685063,0.00004861263,0.00111177,0.000006444257,0.0003909569,0.03653929,0.4659826,0.009521392,0.00606015,0.009011385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002257419,0.00213298,0.6311197,0.0000823178,0.000216943,0.00004223992,0.0002020673,0.02234408,0.3351437,0.006126151,0.0001835061,0.0001488696],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928895,0.00009344024,0.00571433,0.0004272308,0.0003067568,0.0001022265,0.0004003669,5.894902e-7,0.00006558607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985244,0.00007004522,0.001220023,0.00006917169,0.00007604423,0.000002265119,0.00002393799,0.000004494352,0.000009570285],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1626134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5983721,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008290049680790001,"score_gpt":0.2870186780345715,"score_spread":0.2787286283537815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}