{"id":"W1965306223","doi":"10.1053/apmr.2001.19473","title":"Effect of seat cushion on dynamic stability in sitting during a reaching task in wheelchair users with paraplegia","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation","topic":"Spinal Cord Injury Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Cushion; Wheelchair; Sagittal plane; Paraplegia; Sitting; Center of pressure (fluid mechanics); Ischial tuberosity; Cushioning; Medicine; Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Orthodontics; Structural engineering; Engineering; Surgery; Anatomy; Spinal cord; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006530069,0.0001432699,0.000529036,0.0004683169,0.00002619236,0.000001650978,0.00005439279,0.00003059974,0.000002440094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001915834,0.00009212641,0.00006327101,0.0004079903,0.0005178772,0.00009109121,0.0000292098,0.0003505783,3.053277e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005987844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027718,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000299032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009309404,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983584,0.000417285,0.000345916,0.0003106272,0.0003588859,0.0002088811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944775,0.005087792,0.00009574338,0.0002258588,0.00003137397,0.00008178925],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01696462,0.0003827207,0.5558574,0.002251246,0.00001692486,0.00001554995,0.01181693,0.00008287036,0.3825655,0.000115394,5.105347e-7,0.02993035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004658768,0.04615764,0.9291719,0.004858964,0.0000336302,0.000006421609,0.002850465,0.007225728,0.004406035,0.0005409808,0.000001715399,0.00008771803],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975719,0.00005311986,0.00003031917,0.001086552,0.00000999018,0.0007497641,0.000001350589,0.00001167822,0.0004853531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995512,0.00002331734,0.000325928,0.000009652821,0.00003415377,0.00002912054,0.000007748365,0.00001295459,0.000005901519],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3781595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3756806,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01082158237836651,"score_gpt":0.3360605503886988,"score_spread":0.3252389680103323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}