{"id":"W1965306223","doi":"10.1053/apmr.2001.19473","title":"Effect of seat cushion on dynamic stability in sitting during a reaching task in wheelchair users with paraplegia","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation","topic":"Spinal Cord Injury Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Polytechnique Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Cushion; Wheelchair; Sagittal plane; Paraplegia; Sitting; Center of pressure (fluid mechanics); Ischial tuberosity; Cushioning; Medicine; Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Orthodontics; Structural engineering; Engineering; Surgery; Anatomy; Spinal cord; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002029334,0.0005971071,0.0006456164,0.0002508842,0.0004684385,0.0002968872,0.0002461437,0.0005792737,0.003332436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002256465,0.0002646516,0.0003280678,0.0002213155,0.0002760563,0.0002477579,0.0003650699,0.0004917106,0.0003040119],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002152534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003102163,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007158494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009696967,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998602,0.00003634622,0.00001994113,0.00001717427,0.00001761401,0.00004877424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992511,0.0002930622,0.00006499255,0.0000331579,0.00007700536,0.0002807077],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.5403666,0.01262063,0.1190017,0.00122094,0.001201263,0.001492109,0.002844581,0.00141841,0.2209761,0.0001458219,0.001143021,0.09756877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002785823,0.05176814,0.930793,0.00005880096,0.000816039,0.0002649873,0.0008173198,0.001362112,0.01075694,0.00007442331,0.0004583795,0.00004403468],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.999512,0.0001151179,0.00003601813,0.00003061446,0.00001968919,0.000009085477,0.00006902247,0.00000699908,0.0002014803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994925,0.00008889601,0.00007208939,0.00002297092,0.00001491498,0.00001650526,0.00005476599,0.000002759166,0.0002344742],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007158494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01423365,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01082158237836651,"score_gpt":0.3360605503886988,"score_spread":0.3252389680103323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}