{"id":"W1965366468","doi":"10.1071/wf10096","title":"Complexity of homeowner wildfire risk mitigation: an integration of hazard theories","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Wildland Fire","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction","keywords":"Business; Hazard; Disaster mitigation; Environmental planning; Risk management; Environmental resource management; Wildland–urban interface; Social connectedness; Environmental science; Psychology; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005745435,0.0001094116,0.000233781,0.00006934693,0.00003666424,0.00001567921,0.0004773216,0.00006134895,0.0006068657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001253072,0.00007982841,0.0001185594,0.00009581895,0.0003459773,0.000617445,0.0000565368,0.0001530523,0.00001299632],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007793761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002090999,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00106609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000299999,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984813,0.000119209,0.0005988801,0.000112125,0.0005972032,0.00009133606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986066,0.00006118753,0.0009936305,0.0001480148,0.0001194628,0.00007107034],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005158138,0.0004761664,0.9317061,0.00001429534,0.0001987707,0.00002548463,0.006396882,0.0002395307,0.005139413,0.00111355,0.0007270377,0.05344698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009565042,0.0007789171,0.9653498,0.0002123278,0.00004920074,0.0001482361,0.000528332,0.007031722,0.01072224,0.01354623,0.0005125593,0.0001639538],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.996466,0.00005071947,0.001099915,0.0001357202,0.0006467924,0.00008023478,0.00004522244,0.000006665531,0.001468779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975544,0.00003784962,0.002165325,0.00003185863,0.0001459767,0.000001031041,0.000009965396,0.000009102672,0.00004446254],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05328302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6644754,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01923057053557087,"score_gpt":0.2428216935210109,"score_spread":0.2235911229854401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}