{"id":"W1965372333","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.07.033","title":"Entangled judgments: Expert preferences for adapting biodiversity conservation to climate change","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Pittsburgh","keywords":"Climate change; Biodiversity; Environmental resource management; Corporate governance; Adaptive management; Preference; Set (abstract data type); Adaptation (eye); Psychology; Ecology; Business; Economics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0114236,0.0003293106,0.0004739702,0.0009111666,0.0007694231,0.003336276,0.0008468457,0.003726579,0.00788868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1112334,0.0003861355,0.0005332294,0.0008474293,0.00224703,0.005220916,0.002109054,0.002586616,0.0003751906],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008998428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000509903,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001581699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00207322,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9944722,0.003373719,0.0003156326,0.0005792448,0.0009080519,0.0003511631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.926327,0.06095138,0.004614763,0.003853983,0.002029089,0.002223751],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.009437612,0.0018342,0.3149607,0.0007992037,0.001743611,0.004689453,0.02216215,0.09569161,0.01155607,0.2159965,0.02099591,0.300133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004853075,0.0006900348,0.1296898,0.0001740429,0.0002687971,0.001244045,0.01255358,0.1578054,0.001881639,0.6873103,0.007623994,0.0002730055],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9440886,0.0004769803,0.02918044,0.004401538,0.0001078288,0.00007224357,0.0001668404,0.00003738219,0.02146808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962017,0.00007285378,0.003084308,0.0002311396,0.00003275751,0.00001819277,0.0000624621,0.000009433613,0.0002871424],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0114236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06041449,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1403798993344167,"score_gpt":0.2159855805003484,"score_spread":0.07560568116593169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}