{"id":"W1965402578","doi":"10.1002/for.1134","title":"Forecasting volatility with support vector machine‐based GARCH model","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forecasting","topic":"Stock Market Forecasting Methods","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia; Fudan University; Kyungpook National University; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity; Support vector machine; Volatility (finance); Econometrics; Artificial neural network; Computer science; Normality; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Economics; Statistics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001795834,0.0003297715,0.000703008,0.0006727473,0.0001279069,0.0005356276,0.0005163124,0.0005617044,0.0006604352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003922719,0.0001555359,0.0004323559,0.0007127597,0.0001834498,0.0006032958,0.0002494022,0.0005491211,0.0001654809],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002904542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000333521,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002394672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001360035,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994907,0.0002357833,0.00003501509,0.00005850484,0.0001405871,0.00003934034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984408,0.001108843,0.0001508191,0.0000824514,0.0001865189,0.00003059288],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000205067,0.00008351308,0.007056885,0.00006290267,0.0001114826,0.00009133371,0.00003049177,0.8999889,0.002013133,0.003015564,0.0006624883,0.08667825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003126352,0.000013551,0.0003216219,0.000001565192,0.000003337889,0.00000428624,0.000001352715,0.9988356,0.0002099871,0.0005638358,0.00003974339,0.000002059709],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4788942,0.001088153,0.5173116,0.0003080188,0.00008372934,0.00002652583,0.0001704414,0.0006107462,0.001506564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9731008,0.0001733097,0.02616911,0.00001605594,0.00002321611,0.00001011285,0.00008873949,0.000007250636,0.0004113195],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002394672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009497344,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2387891771350272,"score_gpt":0.4069124056440709,"score_spread":0.1681232285090437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}