{"id":"W1965433313","doi":"10.1021/la1020675","title":"Range of Validity of Drop Shape Techniques for Surface Tension Measurement","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Langmuir","topic":"Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of New Brunswick","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Dimensionless quantity; Drop (telecommunication); Surface tension; Shape parameter; Curvature; Shape factor; Spinning drop method; Weber number; Mechanics; RADIUS; Shape analysis (program analysis); Geometry; Mathematics; Thermodynamics; Physics; Statistics; Reynolds number; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008683178,0.001033485,0.00132023,0.003286563,0.0006092056,0.002329492,0.001814224,0.002279749,0.001626341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03727449,0.0004606867,0.0007240577,0.002118213,0.001161256,0.001743274,0.002992216,0.001489632,0.001387765],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000599938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005153642,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006914183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003767814,"domain_scores_codex":[0.984418,0.003074307,0.001220848,0.002397744,0.008210914,0.0006782941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9617051,0.02364092,0.001870591,0.006733927,0.005588401,0.0004609453],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001319638,0.0002263934,0.03472888,0.001044995,0.0001711509,0.000865064,0.0008531946,0.01975477,0.719692,0.01016323,0.001539831,0.2096409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007252964,0.001461658,0.03716846,0.0002752375,0.0001280739,0.003116128,0.0005332882,0.1902357,0.7431872,0.01128569,0.01227848,0.0002575007],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4620662,0.01148135,0.4981904,0.0009352228,0.0004678924,0.0003548556,0.001568828,0.00243592,0.02249938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9455425,0.001781272,0.04995576,0.0002356094,0.0001304417,0.0002493185,0.00106456,0.0002305445,0.0008100751],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008683178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04592156,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08042636359283137,"score_gpt":0.2890403078968113,"score_spread":0.2086139443039799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}