{"id":"W1965449772","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2012.11.002","title":"Disability and accessibility in the library and information science literature: A content analysis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library & Information Science Research","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Theme (computing); Perception; Subject (documents); Web accessibility; Content analysis; Disability studies; Information science; Public relations; Sociology; Library science; Psychology; Social science; Political science; World Wide Web; The Internet; Computer science; Gender studies","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009886542,0.0002985368,0.0009257345,0.056741,0.00311108,0.005480563,0.000860917,0.0006794772,0.005036146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0733416,0.0002409694,0.0009754875,0.04292036,0.002777303,0.003592575,0.005561313,0.0006045016,0.0002333625],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005923253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01275284,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008894377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007950384,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9900131,0.003898227,0.002445902,0.0004642654,0.002652104,0.000526345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8650105,0.1105588,0.006932806,0.001331215,0.0145968,0.001569926],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000685353,0.000652304,0.5101424,0.01176847,0.0007739639,0.00126344,0.2316573,0.0008732557,0.002825534,0.02510767,0.004388832,0.2098615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001067873,0.000456603,0.521512,0.01076368,0.002223723,0.001238592,0.4000529,0.002678969,0.001903935,0.008110651,0.05082362,0.0001284952],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9667475,0.008326376,0.00260957,0.001684928,0.00007915519,0.001535059,0.00304289,0.00002314024,0.0159514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856502,0.005108609,0.004930754,0.0002799687,0.0001019109,0.001048826,0.001400841,0.00002477063,0.001454054],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9901134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05228567,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07163372747329368,"score_gpt":0.3818103625733069,"score_spread":0.3101766351000132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}