{"id":"W1965449772","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2012.11.002","title":"Disability and accessibility in the library and information science literature: A content analysis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Library & Information Science Research","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Theme (computing); Perception; Subject (documents); Web accessibility; Content analysis; Disability studies; Information science; Public relations; Sociology; Library science; Psychology; Social science; Political science; World Wide Web; The Internet; Computer science; Gender studies","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00969581,0.0001448998,0.0002039853,0.001494294,0.001933712,0.01947403,0.002085071,0.0000844654,0.0002409473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003145474,0.00009647402,0.000060013,0.0172187,0.01871431,0.4152277,0.001159174,0.0004333484,0.0000421978],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001088446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009903091,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005598341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003203381,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994807,0.0004657046,0.0007274525,0.0003877249,0.002764122,0.000847979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974599,0.0009423832,0.0001470216,0.0006826324,0.0003803726,0.000387688],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002079337,0.00006880626,0.7454342,0.00007722897,0.000004649565,1.410099e-7,0.05507396,0.000002536122,0.00001291005,0.168686,0.00008887905,0.03052991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001255987,0.00003668521,0.9328728,0.0000221974,0.000003716242,7.718162e-7,0.04512367,0.001143665,0.00009514648,0.0171886,0.003264571,0.0001225231],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8712047,0.00006393163,0.000006508072,0.01130532,0.00005043035,0.001156043,0.00002997235,0.00007799617,0.1161051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985242,0.00022317,0.0002368711,0.0007243993,0.0000277955,0.0001383454,0.0000317435,0.000002528174,0.00009090715],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3957537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993656,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07163372747329368,"score_gpt":0.3818103625733069,"score_spread":0.3101766351000132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}