{"id":"W1965488254","doi":"10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.02.030","title":"A Method to Validate Quantitative High-Frequency Power Doppler Ultrasound With Fluorescence in Vivo Video Microscopy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology","topic":"Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"London Health Sciences Centre; Western University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Cutoff; Doppler effect; Imaging phantom; Biomedical engineering; Ultrasound; Gold standard (test); Vascularity; Materials science; In vivo; Blood flow; Doppler ultrasound; Optics; Radiology; Acoustics; Physics; Medicine; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003758274,0.001144249,0.0004865324,0.00164345,0.001186618,0.001087444,0.001814324,0.001915942,0.002079384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003554077,0.0008443551,0.0005226436,0.0007337868,0.001398984,0.001305985,0.001435838,0.001455994,0.001157899],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001644681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001566447,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00602413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005284769,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977301,0.0006681576,0.0001432982,0.0005467787,0.0007156262,0.0001960835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961895,0.001426773,0.0003916699,0.0007505325,0.001097558,0.0001440061],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006243328,0.00006429195,0.000789877,0.00008947591,0.00001335773,0.00004213503,0.00008013687,0.0005008161,0.988372,0.001854445,0.000234495,0.007896625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003670248,0.0002490723,0.003839992,0.00003051021,0.00004540488,0.0004092398,0.00006180307,0.02263703,0.9663706,0.0006391471,0.005634013,0.00004642483],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.09943624,0.0008880715,0.8933134,0.0002959329,0.0001441737,0.0005628578,0.0003391215,0.001188535,0.003831553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2550937,0.0008250142,0.7381556,0.0002179289,0.00005622873,0.001257418,0.0005669334,0.0003407805,0.003486338],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00602413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01987594,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01442865952795206,"score_gpt":0.322235137058844,"score_spread":0.3078064775308919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}