{"id":"W1965559499","doi":"10.1080/07055900.2013.808167","title":"Climate and Streamflow Trends in the Columbia River Basin: Evidence for Ecological and Engineering Resilience to Climate Change","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ATMOSPHERE-OCEAN","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Geological Survey; U.S. Forest Service; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Streamflow; Climate change; Snowmelt; Environmental science; Flood forecasting; Hydropower; Precipitation; Drainage basin; Hydrology (agriculture); Surface runoff; Climatology; Geography; Ecology; Geology; Oceanography; Meteorology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004073094,0.0001264098,0.0001530157,0.000004948354,0.0002152078,0.00006632915,0.0001871423,0.00005342702,0.0002824942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005227066,0.00009950137,0.00002262082,0.0001710769,0.0001798809,0.0003276519,0.0003714888,0.00007576664,0.0000371758],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000289073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":5.434346e-7,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009684221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001037457,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989173,0.00004289432,0.0001414234,0.000356797,0.000103808,0.000437822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995415,0.0001980498,0.00003089691,0.0001595882,0.000003979945,0.00006597086],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002310489,0.00003977732,0.9763253,0.00002417654,0.000006664212,0.00000900319,0.001799599,0.0004496316,0.00002569561,0.000111312,0.005130926,0.01605477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002211552,0.0002151247,0.992888,0.00002689692,0.00001528708,0.000002871833,0.000217833,0.004618133,0.00000428873,0.0001744102,0.001482681,0.0001333699],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959854,0.00006766012,0.00001935154,0.002712534,0.00004323752,0.0005363876,0.000005395892,0.00002675183,0.0006032821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964629,0.0002820005,0.001574467,0.00139805,0.00002314851,0.0001059552,0.000001480175,0.00000766647,0.0001443643],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01656261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4057548,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01974822335070387,"score_gpt":0.2388332270620462,"score_spread":0.2190850037113423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}