{"id":"W1965665528","doi":"10.2166/wst.2014.038","title":"A novel approach to analyzing concentration polarization of polysaccharide solutions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Science & Technology","topic":"Membrane Separation Technologies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Canadian Water Network","keywords":"Radius of gyration; Polymer; Concentration polarization; Hydrodynamic radius; Membrane; Chemistry; Polysaccharide; Filtration (mathematics); Permeability (electromagnetism); Chromatography; Chemical engineering; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Organic chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004705731,0.000573222,0.0004920649,0.00111976,0.0003535641,0.0006358133,0.000702856,0.0008314042,0.0007009649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001042845,0.0002769299,0.0005518899,0.0006037836,0.0004559982,0.001287049,0.0006784416,0.001697379,0.0003036651],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005018892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005638322,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004584387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003676833,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993536,0.00008885009,0.00002569677,0.0001496659,0.0003331254,0.0000490325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994673,0.0001822829,0.000108965,0.00005941201,0.000146799,0.00003523851],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003902692,0.00004823549,0.0005195073,0.0001213423,0.00001906493,0.000065349,0.00004322173,0.0008747687,0.9698533,0.002442863,0.0001655263,0.02580779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001019257,0.0002554746,0.001462883,0.0000109958,0.00002306999,0.0005408239,0.00003160607,0.03068877,0.9602575,0.001399642,0.005282355,0.00003664152],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08131636,0.001757204,0.9125689,0.0003826654,0.0002151655,0.0001721174,0.0002701092,0.0007265298,0.002590954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.525308,0.003739629,0.4651423,0.0005101714,0.0002762989,0.0004809698,0.0003696494,0.0001361835,0.004036872],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00111976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.003641427,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01606674907947562,"score_gpt":0.2318288150757475,"score_spread":0.2157620659962719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}