{"id":"W1965727989","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.08.060","title":"Optical analysis of an accommodating intraocular lens","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery","topic":"Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"JDSU (Canada); University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Lens (geology); Intraocular lens; Optometry; Optics; Entrance pupil; Point (geometry); Pupil; Computer science; Ophthalmology; Intraocular lenses; Image quality; Computer vision; Artificial intelligence; Medicine; Image (mathematics); Mathematics; Physics; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001162547,0.0001520599,0.001115504,0.0007538197,0.00007689626,0.0000106857,0.00007135022,0.0001096523,0.0001059131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006052933,0.0001154619,0.0006075311,0.0005965373,0.0001381224,0.000602437,0.00002781663,0.0004181691,0.000003368754],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007325462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001510796,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009570917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005570831,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982523,0.0001402809,0.0008526304,0.0001404984,0.0003887388,0.0002256045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972234,0.001051063,0.0009132816,0.0001998697,0.0005131094,0.00009929762],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001365372,0.002581479,0.9727873,0.00005012568,0.003950879,0.0008174792,0.0001296101,0.0001018808,0.01337253,0.00007253861,0.0005420385,0.004228787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003465649,0.0008389629,0.9840872,0.00008961141,0.00303675,0.0004406105,0.000307027,0.00009532369,0.01004101,0.00006357972,0.0005476166,0.0001057837],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.997919,0.0003720178,0.0001656642,0.0004815753,0.000154002,0.00005862903,0.000009002127,0.000006838357,0.0008332917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988367,0.00008089674,0.0005325888,0.0001298634,0.0003194463,0.000001102717,0.00004451099,0.000012104,0.0000427926],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01129987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4708399,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03550895754601874,"score_gpt":0.3585045622399572,"score_spread":0.3229956046939385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}