{"id":"W1965727989","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.08.060","title":"Optical analysis of an accommodating intraocular lens","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery","topic":"Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"JDSU (Canada); University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Lens (geology); Intraocular lens; Optometry; Optics; Entrance pupil; Point (geometry); Pupil; Computer science; Ophthalmology; Intraocular lenses; Image quality; Computer vision; Artificial intelligence; Medicine; Image (mathematics); Mathematics; Physics; Geometry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001908314,0.0003620776,0.0001590732,0.0003331898,0.000302909,0.0004161639,0.0003208184,0.0002125075,0.0008528909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007989556,0.0001506521,0.0003019284,0.0002061772,0.0003444102,0.0002472828,0.0001647992,0.0001405534,0.0001368785],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001352867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008703832,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0147425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006088059,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998379,0.00002312904,0.000006412849,0.00002540907,0.00008800838,0.00001915765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996093,0.0001330779,0.0001067542,0.00003832805,0.00009783257,0.00001475616],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005250294,0.0002266082,0.03207278,0.0003785198,0.00009198533,0.0003712227,0.0001885213,0.3360558,0.5869756,0.008955183,0.0004558585,0.03370286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001195204,0.001311101,0.0599651,0.00004226112,0.0001185459,0.0006524437,0.0001095543,0.7658254,0.1666565,0.002094108,0.003045054,0.00006040315],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9672555,0.0002001033,0.02822656,0.0000326986,0.000004349638,0.00005681192,0.000140272,0.00008306364,0.004000656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932038,0.00009425486,0.006076974,0.000007035768,0.000001117217,0.00002296787,0.00007656971,0.000007051116,0.0005102498],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0147425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02931339,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03550895754601874,"score_gpt":0.3585045622399572,"score_spread":0.3229956046939385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}