{"id":"W1965888020","doi":"10.1890/07-2079.1","title":"Demographic trade‐offs in a neutral model explain death‐rate–abundance‐rank relationship","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Neutral theory of molecular evolution; Ecology; Biology; Interspecific competition; Abundance (ecology); Relative species abundance; Relative abundance distribution; Per capita; Competition (biology); Biodiversity; Demography; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002171549,0.0005502562,0.0006913399,0.001038215,0.000822863,0.00180068,0.001489235,0.001597189,0.008828191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009848707,0.000341588,0.0006990539,0.0006242558,0.001419961,0.002313101,0.001083606,0.001398896,0.001988384],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001332754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004370414,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002241569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001718199,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996562,0.0001405931,0.00001378413,0.00005458712,0.00004660742,0.00008821521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967073,0.001916439,0.000563378,0.0002271464,0.0002538118,0.000331869],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002488278,0.0001362362,0.03477086,0.0001892744,0.0001695112,0.0009253736,0.0009169398,0.2051332,0.002344185,0.7247607,0.006046519,0.0243583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004828189,0.00005456527,0.006369054,0.00002013825,0.00005028308,0.0005351563,0.0001556909,0.4184142,0.0002106736,0.5716141,0.002477808,0.00005005858],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7302547,0.00233212,0.2077055,0.008888389,0.0002361309,0.00005901471,0.0005623155,0.0004608649,0.049501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895853,0.0005243549,0.002690918,0.0002660418,0.00009094767,0.00002535031,0.00007519039,0.00004049867,0.006701404],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008828191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02953327,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06543975625348837,"score_gpt":0.2331285431268917,"score_spread":0.1676887868734033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}