{"id":"W1966017566","doi":"10.1016/j.aim.2004.12.004","title":"On the notion of canonical dimension for algebraic groups","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in Mathematics","topic":"Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Hypersurface; Dimension (graph theory); Invariant theory; Algebraic number; Algebraic group; Invariant (physics); Pure mathematics; Algebraic surface; Algebra over a field; Geometric invariant theory; Dimension of an algebraic variety; Algebraic cycle; Algebraic geometry; Degree (music); Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00380494,0.001212967,0.001608429,0.004766542,0.003034059,0.005717809,0.001607913,0.001788354,0.004287262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007835696,0.0007102709,0.0009631233,0.003676762,0.0154714,0.01737252,0.005731847,0.00619649,0.0006921191],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002404602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008878608,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001212035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008322166,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979852,0.0007564347,0.0001231082,0.0004149524,0.0004550043,0.0002651653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950613,0.00276988,0.0003585575,0.0005263748,0.0006103248,0.000673444],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001231891,0.000004677171,0.00009908028,0.00001549538,0.00000299307,0.00001314663,0.0001222186,0.0001689761,0.0001105867,0.9972198,0.0006707116,0.001559909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000463084,0.000007875552,0.0001303519,0.000009851869,0.000003891867,0.00003402821,0.0000539087,0.0006741181,0.0000591451,0.9962627,0.002750983,0.00000847868],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2587498,0.02175066,0.373125,0.02357658,0.00386459,0.0001126808,0.0009444077,0.0004852758,0.317391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9354059,0.005481178,0.03923743,0.002094566,0.00336282,0.0001237397,0.0003878735,0.000173147,0.01373336],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005717809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02012265,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02356248128491482,"score_gpt":0.3106449518413418,"score_spread":0.2870824705564269,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}