{"id":"W1966199374","doi":"10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.038","title":"Nonhuman primate event-related potentials associated with pro- and anti-saccades","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"NeuroImage","topic":"Neural dynamics and brain function","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Robarts Clinical Trials; Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Saccade; Macaque; Psychology; Event-related potential; Stimulus (psychology); Negativity effect; Neuroscience; Primate; Frontal eye fields; Eye movement; Electrophysiology; Audiology; Electroencephalography; Cognitive psychology; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001443654,0.0002197169,0.0001278012,0.0003058308,0.0002086991,0.0003081379,0.0001317069,0.0003647919,0.003005553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001529148,0.0001109501,0.0001158011,0.000365433,0.000385292,0.0002754017,0.0002121775,0.0004743659,0.0003114283],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001635023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001321077,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001699555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00316591,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999946,0.0000112749,0.000002491093,0.00001153464,0.00001302721,0.00001573553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997565,0.0001245395,0.00004928551,0.00001997587,0.00003050958,0.00001916512],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004746155,0.0001464425,0.01813667,0.0004291093,0.0001099866,0.003230043,0.001093499,0.0005900357,0.8934891,0.00349128,0.002025508,0.07251206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001626802,0.001198443,0.8532687,0.0001258829,0.0001824232,0.01184051,0.001085277,0.003815005,0.1136708,0.008380546,0.006234745,0.00003495794],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879293,0.001144468,0.002961606,0.000203524,0.00003169973,0.00005203767,0.0005163638,0.0000539086,0.007106923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966218,0.0006016826,0.0008345315,0.00009654449,0.00002437724,0.00003739299,0.0002175861,0.00002460214,0.001541367],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003005553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01005459,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02005627544389046,"score_gpt":0.2619926032642629,"score_spread":0.2419363278203725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}