{"id":"W1966222692","doi":"10.1890/06-1545.1","title":"MECHANISTIC ANALYSIS OF INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION USING FORAGING TRADE-OFFS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DUCK ASSEMBLAGES","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Interspecific competition; Ecology; Predation; Foraging; Biology; Habitat; Competition (biology); Resource (disambiguation); Abundance (ecology); Niche differentiation","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001159915,0.00006394991,0.0001969589,0.000110025,0.0002761273,0.000002158673,0.00008958236,0.00005260334,0.0002437882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004770847,0.00006730009,0.00008360791,0.0002969949,0.0001835033,0.00005498928,0.00004545661,0.00003986822,0.000009764483],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001158316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007726108,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001903472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001321085,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994192,0.00003622825,0.0001927052,0.0001782044,0.00003221918,0.000141455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994842,0.0002545124,0.000121074,0.0001069105,0.00001215144,0.0000211593],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001695627,0.0002040406,0.9111247,0.00001419168,0.0005046975,0.000001930841,0.001519706,0.02370498,0.0190642,0.04327594,0.0004147447,0.0001539357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000145042,0.00006649813,0.9496883,0.000001295471,0.0002642947,0.000007130979,0.0002121537,0.04500487,0.0001411104,0.004333906,0.00006501088,0.00007041685],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9209327,0.00001389651,0.07729035,0.0006938041,0.0001032464,0.0001656803,0.00002006435,0.00001604243,0.0007641963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957348,0.00002235625,0.003995991,0.00008963203,0.000008758895,0.00003655132,0.0000324859,0.000004837356,0.00007461428],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07480206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2744418,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03443773854656441,"score_gpt":0.286484570242944,"score_spread":0.2520468316963796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}