{"id":"W1966222692","doi":"10.1890/06-1545.1","title":"MECHANISTIC ANALYSIS OF INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION USING FORAGING TRADE-OFFS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DUCK ASSEMBLAGES","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Interspecific competition; Ecology; Predation; Foraging; Biology; Habitat; Competition (biology); Resource (disambiguation); Abundance (ecology); Niche differentiation","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001097028,0.0005901446,0.0008497629,0.0006265975,0.0004998706,0.001317135,0.001070712,0.0009513643,0.001705646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002068201,0.0005592707,0.001108428,0.0002362198,0.0008477567,0.001617539,0.0006724239,0.0005651092,0.0002127167],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001617878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006033499,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004358238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005213051,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997408,0.00008950479,0.00002615551,0.00007461848,0.00003155682,0.00003743164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988985,0.0004698271,0.0003161157,0.00008623179,0.00008864175,0.0001406911],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004107823,0.0004169763,0.2624616,0.0003339891,0.0005351698,0.0005620206,0.0006063354,0.6484384,0.04028675,0.03019124,0.000404102,0.01535265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002275542,0.0001616439,0.1016789,0.00001692367,0.00006845987,0.0002713265,0.0002032403,0.8807877,0.001214812,0.0150716,0.000438428,0.00006428738],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9821264,0.0001897311,0.01527312,0.0002376234,0.00000648173,0.00002424182,0.0001030428,0.00004999728,0.001989377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969108,0.00005979601,0.002686539,0.00002704022,0.000002872881,0.00002085609,0.00004593244,0.000009531706,0.0002367684],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004358238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0117386,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03443773854656441,"score_gpt":0.286484570242944,"score_spread":0.2520468316963796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}