{"id":"W1966234893","doi":"10.1118/1.3301574","title":"Monte Carlo calculated absorbed‐dose energy dependence of EBT and EBT2 film","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Physics","topic":"Radiation Shielding Materials Analysis","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":155,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs; Canada Foundation for Innovation","keywords":"Absorbed dose; Photon; Monte Carlo method; Absorption (acoustics); Materials science; Range (aeronautics); Photon energy; Irradiation; Atomic physics; Electron; Dosimetry; Stopping power; Physics; Nuclear physics; Optics; Nuclear medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004124129,0.0003504002,0.0002454088,0.0004052646,0.0002004868,0.0004739413,0.0004031828,0.0004894737,0.003518614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001389599,0.0002936166,0.0004190637,0.0003602609,0.0002084547,0.0003134383,0.0001430308,0.0003207524,0.0008156216],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009981233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002572187,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00243191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00188402,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998015,0.00002856251,0.00001291591,0.00004129698,0.00009699689,0.00001876587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993764,0.000324172,0.0000836258,0.00004817055,0.0001566162,0.00001108127],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00152751,0.0001283597,0.02095979,0.001019315,0.0002500738,0.0008219985,0.0003165329,0.3955644,0.5420133,0.003125543,0.001791621,0.03248153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006061978,0.0003261152,0.03027533,0.00006733703,0.0001217901,0.0007642086,0.00006189621,0.2416712,0.7211353,0.0005987496,0.004856939,0.00006062094],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8732857,0.002949884,0.09776465,0.0002168284,0.00004854553,0.0001440678,0.001679264,0.001767013,0.0221441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9798551,0.0006726604,0.01532186,0.00009464511,0.000005322196,0.00008987255,0.000825117,0.0004112575,0.0027242],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003518614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0117709,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.00853654673779856,"score_gpt":0.24336794161169,"score_spread":0.2348313948738914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}