{"id":"W1966237012","doi":"10.1109/lawp.2012.2224840","title":"An Active Electromagnetic Cloak Using the Equivalence Principle","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters","topic":"Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cloak; Cloaking; Physics; Scattering; Electromagnetic field; Electromagnetic radiation; Magnetic field; Discretization; Magnetic dipole; Boundary value problem; Optics; Acoustics; Classical mechanics; Computer science; Metamaterial; Mathematical analysis; Mathematics; Quantum mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003765639,0.0004252649,0.0004201745,0.000390605,0.0004800499,0.001189906,0.0005441298,0.001333526,0.003288198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009268302,0.0002430073,0.0004440156,0.0002351264,0.001219812,0.001506369,0.001200326,0.0009995003,0.0007823048],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000340446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002716046,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002139675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001751515,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996036,0.0001154456,0.00001440487,0.00005904622,0.0001682231,0.00003923435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997776,0.00009621416,0.00002314166,0.00004588748,0.00004090782,0.00001624737],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004829648,0.00004080009,0.00008373887,0.00005661118,0.000007063085,0.0001667167,0.00008548595,0.009449538,0.0512644,0.9203427,0.001196832,0.01725776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008463902,0.000175287,0.000266108,0.00004306131,0.00001729712,0.0009753564,0.00007430278,0.3428574,0.0417344,0.5693876,0.04433189,0.00005270515],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0209506,0.0004900859,0.9157872,0.000549718,0.0002115699,0.00005871544,0.0000324409,0.000204488,0.06171514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7330017,0.0009218812,0.2329865,0.0008044788,0.0002768128,0.0002051964,0.00009419074,0.0001940549,0.03151523],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003288198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01100016,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03014367935571825,"score_gpt":0.2950612086567538,"score_spread":0.2649175293010356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}