{"id":"W1966330754","doi":"10.1139/x10-229","title":"Assessing terrestrial lichen biomass using ecoforest maps: a suitable approach to plan conservation areas for forest-dwelling caribou","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Lichen and fungal ecology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies; Université du Québec à Rimouski","keywords":"Lichen; Threatened species; Biomass (ecology); Geography; Ecology; Environmental science; Altitude (triangle); Moss; Forestry; Endangered species; Population; Physical geography; Biology; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002482082,0.0001628438,0.0003084602,0.0002605493,0.0007511717,0.0004069673,0.0006329686,0.0002415084,0.00007406009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008259396,0.00008124216,0.0001415957,0.0006719125,0.0001765065,0.0004787142,0.0000474404,0.0004237471,0.000007415949],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003088072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009295034,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1002933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.467543,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976831,0.0001942217,0.0004893074,0.000275546,0.0003302888,0.001027531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976484,0.0004961415,0.0001860321,0.00009126609,0.0005348428,0.001043306],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002252946,0.00008505877,0.9868515,0.00002995074,0.00006134393,0.00006535371,0.0007553117,0.0001462963,0.003939179,0.001908082,0.0039939,0.001938772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008150773,0.00144013,0.9625304,0.0001393133,0.00004299233,0.0002003998,0.002785349,0.002846696,0.0007253523,0.006573129,0.02151537,0.0003857393],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959691,0.0001043149,0.0002633827,0.0005636967,0.0003194376,0.0005517978,0.00007998253,0.00000788253,0.002140361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962368,0.000002568478,0.002548755,0.0001170907,0.000893884,0.00002206416,0.00008031695,0.000005065072,0.00009346427],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3672497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9056979,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2892799311215314,"score_gpt":0.3322133988293903,"score_spread":0.04293346770785889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}