{"id":"W1966431950","doi":"10.1139/t08-005","title":"Vertical uplift capacity of horizontal anchors using upper bound limit analysis and finite elements","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Limit analysis; Embedment; Geology; Classification of discontinuities; Geotechnical engineering; Finite element method; Wedge (geometry); Upper and lower bounds; Plasticity; Limit (mathematics); Geometry; Mechanics; Structural engineering; Mathematics; Materials science; Engineering; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007949262,0.00043189,0.0006455462,0.001650457,0.0003779747,0.001133262,0.0009076794,0.0007677645,0.002249878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002273861,0.0005107379,0.0007471585,0.0007152559,0.001021837,0.0009453083,0.0008041598,0.0005336305,0.0003311479],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007439935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007451561,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004585525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002811367,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997101,0.00005388938,0.00001735106,0.00003546942,0.0001349362,0.0000481729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993249,0.0004065257,0.00008646456,0.00005702752,0.00009533713,0.00002981013],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001969144,0.00001548469,0.000490666,0.00002092408,0.000005147398,0.00005247332,0.00002950155,0.9840392,0.003432196,0.006277283,0.00006780981,0.005549634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.759658e-7,0.000005608963,0.00009339894,0.000003206533,0.000001491372,0.000006487179,0.000005622298,0.9980848,0.0006099851,0.001095193,0.00009061235,0.000002786328],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2903106,0.0002753026,0.6942928,0.0001288398,0.00002602778,0.00004927368,0.0001316617,0.0002865415,0.01449898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.967666,0.0001472446,0.02842398,0.00001355281,0.000008836999,0.00007161311,0.00007878314,0.00006224336,0.003527622],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004585525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009117663,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01774113398358002,"score_gpt":0.1987215842660924,"score_spread":0.1809804502825124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}