{"id":"W1966443774","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-3148.2004.00211.x","title":"Should Actuarial Risk Assessments be Used with Sex Offenders who are Intellectually Disabled?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York Central Hospital; Public Safety Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Recidivism; Psychology; Risk assessment; Population; Sex offender; Actuarial science; Personality; Sample (material); Clinical psychology; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Medicine; Business; Environmental health","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005301769,0.0007070284,0.001382968,0.001636346,0.0004421719,0.0003138504,0.00153284,0.0004834088,0.002572736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004233384,0.000550597,0.0003237989,0.00195484,0.002487047,0.0004156012,0.0002760488,0.004517291,0.0001799917],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001691137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009036087,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003745431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008546288,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9915386,0.001014786,0.001767823,0.0009797466,0.002845182,0.001853799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846759,0.01249059,0.0007244984,0.001030263,0.0004912023,0.0005875264],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.04120912,0.00693279,0.008852848,0.0004210256,0.00273292,0.0003229128,0.5211474,0.004728875,0.0009352744,0.04272254,0.3587133,0.01128095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01386431,0.008570053,0.001915343,0.001117613,0.000136308,0.0003203889,0.8654302,0.00007645836,0.001649534,0.09328959,0.01237014,0.001260066],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8826047,0.0002163847,0.002496838,0.001996049,0.01255041,0.001289397,0.00006152494,0.00007936887,0.09870534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957098,0.0001442298,0.0009141603,0.0002228704,0.001871442,0.0001165922,0.000009613543,0.0001594133,0.0008519276],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3463432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996945,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2087019933643009,"score_gpt":0.4340740162417431,"score_spread":0.2253720228774422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}