{"id":"W1966542460","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.11.020","title":"Informed consent in biobank research: A deliberative approach to the debate","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science & Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Biobank; Context (archaeology); Informed consent; Corporate governance; Public health; Public engagement; Research ethics; Event (particle physics); Stratified sampling; Political science; Public relations; Psychology; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Geography; Business; Nursing; Bioinformatics; Psychiatry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02039857,0.0001301455,0.0003572439,0.0005110333,0.001249184,0.00002493982,0.0008445387,0.0001821378,0.00007761674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09553689,0.00007274238,0.0000506069,0.005191156,0.01333232,0.0001179433,0.0003252286,0.002346631,0.00009401872],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006002815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008400542,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001137741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00196238,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931636,0.0002911233,0.0005313903,0.0005256102,0.004497616,0.0009906485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877253,0.009720279,0.00006222606,0.0004622072,0.001468471,0.0005615598],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00117053,0.00104794,0.03869116,0.0003741612,0.00005045109,0.0004149143,0.6416514,0.00001323507,0.009182747,0.1869327,0.1012725,0.0191983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01529838,0.006671124,0.6587676,0.003481331,0.00007454208,0.000573523,0.1329463,0.001100511,0.003731889,0.08452191,0.09166905,0.001163813],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6200356,0.0001618621,0.0001556511,0.1204211,0.0002410851,0.001343752,0.000002345473,0.00003676957,0.2576018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989314,0.0005447248,0.0002255013,0.006347328,0.0006765563,0.000103467,0.0000030195,0.00001099463,0.00277445],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6200765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999955,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7950136293260909,"score_gpt":0.6464925930703659,"score_spread":0.148521036255725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}