{"id":"W1966542460","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.11.020","title":"Informed consent in biobank research: A deliberative approach to the debate","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Science & Medicine","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Biobank; Context (archaeology); Informed consent; Corporate governance; Public health; Public engagement; Research ethics; Event (particle physics); Stratified sampling; Political science; Public relations; Psychology; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Geography; Business; Nursing; Bioinformatics; Psychiatry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.499108,0.002146606,0.003971357,0.005204636,0.01738195,0.02355201,0.01080452,0.05844874,0.0051455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.433215,0.002413344,0.002879557,0.004141795,0.1116986,0.03285786,0.02148096,0.04730897,0.001044907],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04176567,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003945388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003249702,"domain_scores_codex":[0.3503705,0.6090981,0.01218369,0.007627839,0.01600973,0.004710164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2881477,0.6814013,0.007133719,0.01170175,0.007433967,0.004181632],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004720384,0.00002825996,0.0001017114,0.0002329331,0.00003956494,0.0002667173,0.01854945,0.0003714321,0.00008418992,0.9701094,0.004466362,0.005702801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000741203,0.00002509461,0.00005551587,0.0007985348,0.00002242458,0.000148706,0.003715271,0.0009547313,0.0001543469,0.9735855,0.02042189,0.00004398214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006725425,0.007975938,0.2817576,0.6444548,0.003738537,0.001579271,0.00008953342,0.00009073139,0.05358817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6223615,0.00808146,0.2378362,0.109768,0.005457915,0.007694238,0.0001227068,0.00019473,0.008483432],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9415513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.617689,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7950136293260909,"score_gpt":0.6464925930703659,"score_spread":0.148521036255725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}