{"id":"W1966589547","doi":"10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[0474:dauoaz]2.0.co;2","title":"DEVELOPMENT AND USE OF A ZOOPLANKTON INDEX OF WETLAND QUALITY IN THE LAURENTIAN GREAT LAKES BASIN","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Applications","topic":"Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":125,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Wetland; Marsh; Ecology; Environmental science; Zooplankton; Macrophyte; Habitat; Species richness; Water quality; Bioindicator; Ecosystem; Index of biological integrity; Indicator species; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002583972,0.00006011907,0.000132495,0.00001439479,0.00005495924,0.000008387144,0.0001231974,0.00005372468,0.0009071091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002189327,0.00003823096,0.00001762428,0.0001558726,0.000114268,0.00003856571,0.00005131293,0.00006205615,0.00002371904],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002177635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002793228,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001336515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007881158,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993102,0.00006245619,0.0002820143,0.0001340576,0.0001195594,0.0000916947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994761,0.0002287648,0.0001089834,0.0001546254,0.000004363308,0.0000271535],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000350503,0.0002646138,0.9899509,0.00001841858,0.000004767236,5.274749e-7,0.0006685475,0.0001046813,0.0001793002,0.004192967,0.0004320851,0.004179673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001211765,0.0000183765,0.9541298,0.000004531697,0.000003471035,0.000002202653,0.00009316038,0.001545629,0.00003336558,0.0004954729,0.04349775,0.00005513886],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961672,0.0000151157,0.001081926,0.0001732844,0.000005304114,0.0003327502,0.00002021407,0.000005296406,0.002198878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978684,0.00001226238,0.001819557,0.00006152358,0.000004184958,0.0001099483,0.00001154346,0.000001848236,0.0001107082],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04306566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9932208,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03495112096240969,"score_gpt":0.2448543795663394,"score_spread":0.2099032586039297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}