{"id":"W1966623002","doi":"10.1350/ijep.9.2.73.64809","title":"The Contextualised Court: Litigating ‘Culture’ in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Multiculturalism; Legal culture; Law; Contextualism; Order (exchange); Sociology; Political science; Cultural issues; High Court; Cultural diversity; Epistemology; Philosophy; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002362339,0.00006885105,0.00009877144,0.000005521532,0.0004116484,0.0001863251,0.001350676,0.00003740121,0.00008601711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001682984,0.00003182007,0.00008451255,0.0001171191,0.000221891,0.000494545,0.00004866514,0.0003776294,0.000003337238],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008939597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001611841,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1674878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8724051,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978724,0.0002281604,0.0003907888,0.0000682449,0.001252517,0.0001879311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997977,0.0007684542,0.0003857563,0.00007947408,0.0007267988,0.00006250801],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003829631,0.0001336127,0.01746926,0.00001196693,0.0004746939,0.0001291342,0.1985203,0.003099759,0.001029217,0.1065139,0.4379826,0.2342526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040859,0.00002862346,0.002538331,0.0005314022,0.00002021498,0.00004242964,0.05565739,0.0001571316,0.000968932,0.007169513,0.9323421,0.0001353677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2925365,0.01806801,0.00006525426,0.6701642,0.002903558,0.0005118,0.000009215591,0.00001322131,0.01572823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918593,0.001738327,0.00009357764,0.002628183,0.001402642,0.000006931599,2.335748e-7,0.000003550776,0.002267286],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7049173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.838056,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06074616941425492,"score_gpt":0.3488412649417584,"score_spread":0.2880950955275035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}