{"id":"W1966623002","doi":"10.1350/ijep.9.2.73.64809","title":"The Contextualised Court: Litigating ‘Culture’ in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Evidence & Proof","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Multiculturalism; Legal culture; Law; Contextualism; Order (exchange); Sociology; Political science; Cultural issues; High Court; Cultural diversity; Epistemology; Philosophy; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00718434,0.0002323722,0.0005728738,0.002186188,0.03115742,0.01572502,0.002374298,0.002854597,0.00336897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02756834,0.000482369,0.0003382046,0.006171334,0.02633649,0.004412662,0.008313872,0.005733611,0.00010823],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1569712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2260411,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9886848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9947348,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9867677,0.003564352,0.0004569695,0.0009814607,0.004898611,0.003330831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98234,0.007049073,0.00150906,0.0005669472,0.005356687,0.003178336],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001238741,0.00008057896,0.03552126,0.0003557873,0.0001215936,0.002392706,0.3521631,0.001477988,0.001052994,0.5135749,0.01707939,0.07605574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007504522,0.0001027193,0.1000936,0.001908079,0.0002250858,0.0006793268,0.5017201,0.002375771,0.001489709,0.07634971,0.3145903,0.0003904142],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6872143,0.01448411,0.002946144,0.1030698,0.0004787272,0.0001103299,0.0002109252,0.00003020602,0.1914554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918891,0.002259794,0.0004045851,0.003181002,0.00002386063,0.00001052078,0.00002084755,0.000007364273,0.002202918],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1569712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9777939,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06074616941425492,"score_gpt":0.3488412649417584,"score_spread":0.2880950955275035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}