{"id":"W1966782165","doi":"10.1021/ie202880w","title":"Dynamic Risk Assessment and Fault Detection Using Principal Component Analysis","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research","topic":"Fault Detection and Control Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Principal component analysis; Reliability engineering; Fault detection and isolation; Fault (geology); Process (computing); Component (thermodynamics); Risk analysis (engineering); Warning system; Risk assessment; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Engineering; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001236273,0.0002109669,0.0003031017,0.0002637785,0.0001620271,0.0001208805,0.0001354182,0.0003062366,0.00004222451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001185958,0.0002277513,0.00010484,0.000948583,0.00003631492,0.0001582076,0.00006557502,0.001219759,0.000006182041],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007199501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002888191,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001863345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000711086,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981815,0.00007574526,0.0003258123,0.0002314945,0.0005203924,0.0006650315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991522,0.0001397615,0.00003886927,0.0002845437,0.00007367812,0.0003108857],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001105074,0.000020391,0.003623378,0.00005692418,0.0004310767,0.000002363794,0.00004926005,0.2659402,0.727452,0.000001550354,0.000006555931,0.00240517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000553012,0.00001278823,0.003679738,0.0000233136,0.0001223571,0.00001818009,0.00009869847,0.9332931,0.05999145,8.705327e-7,0.001984028,0.0002224448],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957398,0.0002863059,0.002707966,0.000007712018,0.0004374628,0.0002147812,0.00001875216,0.0002793947,0.0003078122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992456,0.00002991094,0.00007072533,5.466645e-7,0.0004880077,0.00004998449,0.00001009029,0.00004062975,0.00006446835],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6674606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9287426,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05427607355759193,"score_gpt":0.3421849376085765,"score_spread":0.2879088640509846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}