{"id":"W1966790617","doi":"10.2166/wst.2009.765","title":"An objective test of stochastic behavior in riverine water quality models","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Science & Technology","topic":"Water Quality and Pollution Assessment","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Conceptual model; Calibration; GLUE; Selection (genetic algorithm); Computer science; Model selection; Quality (philosophy); Water quality; Environmental science; Data mining; Hydrology (agriculture); Operations research; Statistics; Machine learning; Mathematics; Engineering; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009487612,0.0001448088,0.0002167672,0.0003909958,0.0001406278,0.00002299711,0.0008032289,0.0001159659,0.0003256903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002019547,0.00009417281,0.00002987537,0.0006786406,0.001615087,0.0007355061,0.0002706067,0.0001856952,0.0001765972],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002588132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001908174,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005807684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001747028,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980829,0.0000511884,0.0003699878,0.0005154794,0.000389002,0.0005914454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999297,0.000009456826,0.00005431556,0.0005297462,0.00002371759,0.00008575476],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001306992,0.000550286,0.009085915,0.000001783929,6.54281e-7,0.000006391865,0.002793005,0.006966853,0.9763551,0.001203759,0.000002204579,0.003021021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000343004,0.0006516349,0.07568852,0.000006231301,0.000005941116,0.00001363541,0.0003257538,0.00289444,0.8896038,0.03019863,0.00003507328,0.0002333437],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909136,0.000002168257,0.006726053,0.001143332,0.00004713978,0.0002524512,0.000007475268,0.00008943924,0.0008183467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985534,6.691272e-7,0.001200992,0.0001056345,0.000005346522,0.00002666427,0.000003254052,0.000004256579,0.00009976695],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08675127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5950855,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02306450247601718,"score_gpt":0.3075508530952265,"score_spread":0.2844863506192093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}