{"id":"W1966802470","doi":"10.7202/043197ar","title":"A Bench in Disarray : The Quebec Judiciary and The Federal Department of Justice, 1867-1878","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"European Political History Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Opportunism; Political science; Modernization theory; State (computer science); Public administration; Decentralization; Law; Administration (probate law); Administration of justice; George (robot); History","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001612425,0.000218101,0.0003614572,0.002155736,0.02008174,0.008146591,0.001293145,0.002978713,0.01229981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004640998,0.0003181691,0.000198035,0.003575385,0.01366021,0.002271268,0.001679837,0.003625005,0.0004050659],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1824176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06683248,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9924139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978332,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976878,0.0004002707,0.00002831184,0.0001824985,0.000375941,0.001325113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998157,0.0004004227,0.0001664021,0.00004633506,0.0008180893,0.0004118538],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002548913,0.0001111275,0.04757977,0.0001398078,0.0000676101,0.001699098,0.1289707,0.001355819,0.0006884289,0.6936694,0.08316918,0.04229423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005102478,0.00006839791,0.2989216,0.0007052714,0.00006919928,0.0002168964,0.09022149,0.000701885,0.0005565639,0.01119711,0.5971647,0.0001257952],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.551433,0.01099295,0.0005094522,0.0414949,0.000405838,0.00007114341,0.001165229,0.00002622029,0.3939012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.946767,0.0007922194,0.00008785001,0.002040347,0.00004753148,0.00001265157,0.0001043418,0.00001424823,0.05013369],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1824176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9482796,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009594879625843919,"score_gpt":0.2061531911099654,"score_spread":0.1965583114841215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}