{"id":"W1966847917","doi":"10.1007/s00466-004-0549-1","title":"Optimal gains for active vibration control by the beam analogy","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computational Mechanics","topic":"Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control","field":"Engineering","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Finite element method; Optimal control; Analogy; Mathematics; Vibration; Boundary value problem; Domain (mathematical analysis); Control theory (sociology); Beam (structure); Mathematical analysis; Applied mathematics; Computer science; Mathematical optimization; Control (management); Physics; Engineering; Structural engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007532072,0.0001047177,0.0001095665,0.00003029769,0.0001579461,0.00003686186,0.00009921806,0.00006458156,0.00001611642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000518248,0.0000921275,0.00005503464,0.0000825314,0.00001321106,0.0001421479,0.000007098009,0.00009522784,0.00001718059],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007341812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004726827,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001478805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005282959,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994327,0.00001434423,0.0001648059,0.0001140816,0.0001266976,0.000147354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994603,0.0002950171,0.00003801081,0.00006421244,0.0001010654,0.00004135613],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002758112,0.00001719734,3.106627e-7,0.000005449672,0.00004858768,2.164248e-7,0.0001024734,0.9311985,0.001903097,0.0652106,0.000681502,0.0008045238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00146493,0.0000925183,0.0000346435,0.000004600263,0.00002510908,0.000003937839,0.00005562276,0.9721393,0.002369262,0.02306962,0.0006371491,0.0001032842],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007725132,0.00005595399,0.9902791,0.0009286074,0.0002818354,0.0003913844,0.0001708621,0.0001180964,0.00004897493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915051,0.00000248052,0.007331954,0.0007157248,0.0001456833,0.0000930037,0.0001792889,0.0000187693,0.0000079696],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.375685,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01191692361966933,"score_gpt":0.2307735694725807,"score_spread":0.2188566458529114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}