{"id":"W1966883262","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2005.11.007","title":"Evaluating Food Stamp Nutrition Education: A View from the Field of Program Evaluation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Food and Nutrition Service","keywords":"Accountability; Nutrition Education; Field (mathematics); Value (mathematics); Computer science; Evaluation methods; Program evaluation; Food stamps; Monitoring and evaluation; Process management; Management science; Medicine; Political science; Business; Engineering; Gerontology; Public administration; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05700857,0.001727305,0.007977905,0.008853638,0.0005945326,0.004570164,0.003100815,0.003916192,0.001652986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09294871,0.0006589636,0.001697397,0.00889714,0.002576735,0.003030067,0.001610192,0.003560567,0.0004935815],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004522971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01203037,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008053652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01309306,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9660749,0.01802404,0.00391081,0.001245848,0.01029179,0.0004525645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8259943,0.1433395,0.007943577,0.001673349,0.01974143,0.001307996],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001386392,0.0001093337,0.000891953,0.02361032,0.0004634637,0.00003944339,0.0001230487,0.0005697988,0.0001023146,0.003464993,0.006847943,0.9636388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006225034,0.002299464,0.02222486,0.2877937,0.008809897,0.001825826,0.001934133,0.005376079,0.003275801,0.04844936,0.6170051,0.0003832354],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002075227,0.9957622,0.001038233,0.002283057,0.0001721515,0.00003437421,0.00002328691,0.000009943949,0.0004692728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007523006,0.9869809,0.003805268,0.001068162,0.0003257342,0.00008361886,0.00003602519,0.000006557979,0.0001707556],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9429914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3014938,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4103269712639934,"score_gpt":0.6265815540769605,"score_spread":0.2162545828129671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}