{"id":"W1966890465","doi":"10.1081/ias-100103222","title":"COMPARISON OF SOME METHODS FOR DETERMINING CUTOFF VALUES FOR SEROLOGICAL ASSAYS: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY USING THE FLUORESCENCE POLARIZATION ASSAY","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Immunoassay and Immunochemistry","topic":"Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Food Inspection Agency","funders":"","keywords":"Cutoff; Serology; Percentile; Receiver operating characteristic; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Sensitivity (control systems); Chemistry; Chromatography; Statistics; Medicine; Immunology; Mathematics; Physics; Electronic engineering; Engineering; Antibody","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0186189,0.0007172053,0.0006599293,0.005235207,0.0005581917,0.001080202,0.0008050174,0.0008000055,0.0003474429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02797776,0.0004496726,0.0008134802,0.003295742,0.000875774,0.0008111676,0.0004500785,0.000948081,0.0003113725],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006576257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005510573,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001559586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008668573,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9869713,0.005559106,0.002268664,0.001839245,0.00299709,0.0003645907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.968522,0.01556746,0.004853662,0.003333357,0.00715379,0.0005696473],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005567125,0.0001109434,0.9502283,0.0002005783,0.0002142189,0.0003682936,0.0005026405,0.0003445346,0.003136535,0.0002196716,0.0002775217,0.04384007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002531925,0.00155399,0.9656957,0.0001496231,0.0006448259,0.007248341,0.0007838211,0.002298471,0.01504159,0.0003151683,0.006166628,0.00007660728],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9363483,0.01449323,0.04470056,0.0002167681,0.000105307,0.000262017,0.0006740941,0.000102461,0.003097244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822349,0.002837623,0.01355157,0.00007246938,0.00005785521,0.0001592012,0.0007577942,0.00005219271,0.0002763112],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0186189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09846729,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03969304662602995,"score_gpt":0.4128593428931326,"score_spread":0.3731662962671026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}