{"id":"W1966904803","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2008.06.003","title":"Cost–utility analysis in educational needs assessment","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evaluation and Program Planning","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Stakeholder; Ranking (information retrieval); Service (business); Argument (complex analysis); Cost–benefit analysis; Set (abstract data type); Stakeholder analysis; Business; Actuarial science; Marketing; Computer science; Economics; Medicine; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01598184,0.001615609,0.002256203,0.004879076,0.0005902885,0.002446444,0.001561861,0.001769791,0.00742529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06799783,0.001174699,0.002016783,0.003946434,0.001496627,0.002681823,0.001544916,0.002393609,0.0003437713],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00564124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003568308,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007150798,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9788953,0.01871154,0.0002862684,0.0002918441,0.001417081,0.0003979241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9223165,0.07483036,0.0006274395,0.0007518697,0.001184961,0.0002888274],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002127278,0.000818318,0.01057166,0.001120459,0.0009978818,0.0002953678,0.0003003664,0.6582197,0.0003938438,0.0724695,0.004407091,0.2482785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002433348,0.0005491223,0.005194293,0.0003885668,0.0008462695,0.0002844341,0.0002601091,0.9110668,0.0004236782,0.07738049,0.003295289,0.00006763296],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1822701,0.01877433,0.7560246,0.006151708,0.0003226909,0.002876724,0.00149604,0.0003974819,0.0316863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9160118,0.002935291,0.07589811,0.0003374358,0.0001171319,0.0009405317,0.0004001608,0.00009754474,0.00326193],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01598184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08452106,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.196874534501681,"score_gpt":0.51737724662709,"score_spread":0.3205027121254089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}