{"id":"W1966904803","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2008.06.003","title":"Cost–utility analysis in educational needs assessment","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evaluation and Program Planning","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Stakeholder; Ranking (information retrieval); Service (business); Argument (complex analysis); Cost–benefit analysis; Set (abstract data type); Stakeholder analysis; Business; Actuarial science; Marketing; Computer science; Economics; Medicine; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002094691,0.00004974435,0.00008666712,0.0002159271,0.0003971277,0.00005406867,0.0000577167,0.0000458191,0.0007252023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001380011,0.0000500447,0.00002788309,0.001073628,0.00007536831,0.0002243916,0.000008540396,0.0001030121,0.000006961244],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007003995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003899116,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005133646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008949134,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989154,0.0002223401,0.0001384724,0.0001167815,0.0004581866,0.0001488581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995897,0.0001159647,0.00005023436,0.00006574985,0.0001105966,0.00006769834],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004367256,0.00004539729,0.9381817,0.000001756485,0.00001765435,2.679477e-7,0.009294297,0.0003040018,6.020858e-7,0.0001879839,0.0003920028,0.05157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001870448,0.00001436498,0.9567285,0.000008157604,0.00004243911,3.072714e-7,0.00258354,0.02189481,9.019079e-7,0.0002239933,0.01825498,0.00006099899],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9697096,0.0003828274,0.0001013393,0.001411956,0.00009080493,0.0003877441,0.000001282043,0.00002844768,0.02788603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978188,0.00007209448,0.001368003,0.0001096232,0.0001476698,0.0001426893,0.00006416236,0.000001783272,0.0002751548],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.051509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7940457,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.196874534501681,"score_gpt":0.51737724662709,"score_spread":0.3205027121254089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}