{"id":"W1966918386","doi":"10.1007/s00158-010-0529-3","title":"A comparative study of metamodeling methods considering sample quality merits","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization","topic":"Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Western Canada Research Grid","keywords":"Metamodeling; Kriging; Computer science; Robustness (evolution); Artificial neural network; Sample (material); Sample size determination; Data mining; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01957301,0.0006841114,0.001419909,0.002564686,0.0004715666,0.001564643,0.001298245,0.001311782,0.002443927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08417995,0.0003277077,0.0008704487,0.001730082,0.0005971264,0.002638205,0.001020116,0.0006790303,0.0002962086],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007810449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000816426,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001195116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001776829,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9933862,0.004672456,0.0002610607,0.0003814429,0.001174513,0.0001242392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8906921,0.09502914,0.002095937,0.005836389,0.005892822,0.0004535231],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002745294,0.0003487289,0.01380987,0.0007391488,0.0005458607,0.00008416124,0.0004610704,0.2932413,0.01034545,0.02620494,0.001096694,0.6503776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001263014,0.0005986532,0.005974817,0.0001186202,0.0003197418,0.0001450423,0.0002793767,0.967771,0.01160918,0.01128553,0.001726905,0.00004488585],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2006502,0.002213157,0.7900837,0.0004833441,0.00007159441,0.000126429,0.0001656877,0.0007221322,0.005483741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.704298,0.0005997065,0.2935347,0.00006917156,0.00004815708,0.00009537977,0.0001984981,0.0002760574,0.0008803022],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01957301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1035132,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05472640559811635,"score_gpt":0.4063961412182225,"score_spread":0.3516697356201062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}