{"id":"W1966946865","doi":"10.1080/02827580410019490","title":"Estimation of above ground forest biomass from airborne discrete return laser scanner data using canopy-based quantile estimators","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":211,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Biomass (ecology); Canopy; Environmental science; Laser scanning; Estimator; Forest inventory; Mean squared error; Diameter at breast height; Forestry; Mathematics; Geography; Statistics; Forest management; Agroforestry; Laser; Ecology; Archaeology; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001175615,0.0002409687,0.0002285119,0.0006242073,0.0001069612,0.0004496828,0.0004846019,0.0002127118,0.0005982404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002962556,0.0001310683,0.0002849317,0.0006414439,0.0003186356,0.0004401181,0.0003977944,0.0003091484,0.0001584308],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004529266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003104317,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005168486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00601388,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997143,0.0001060575,0.00001138239,0.00006128908,0.00007717762,0.00002962709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986128,0.00084074,0.0002333489,0.0001457539,0.0001395086,0.00002791325],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002370747,0.0001623894,0.223915,0.0001150481,0.0001270904,0.0001212571,0.0002311098,0.6039956,0.02570696,0.00354308,0.0004822524,0.1413632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001104047,0.0000641795,0.06358688,0.00001177035,0.000009995388,0.00004431175,0.00006619612,0.9300061,0.003631702,0.002365802,0.0001842787,0.00001767608],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7148135,0.00008639028,0.2839477,0.00005380146,0.000003894243,0.00001909264,0.0003003166,0.0002815729,0.0004937337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9802755,0.00002114994,0.01938688,0.000006994339,0.000001762612,0.00001252208,0.0001645699,0.000007349155,0.0001232704],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005168486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01027685,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06229634101437313,"score_gpt":0.3572649766072241,"score_spread":0.2949686355928509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}