{"id":"W1966946865","doi":"10.1080/02827580410019490","title":"Estimation of above ground forest biomass from airborne discrete return laser scanner data using canopy-based quantile estimators","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":211,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Biomass (ecology); Canopy; Environmental science; Laser scanning; Estimator; Forest inventory; Mean squared error; Diameter at breast height; Forestry; Mathematics; Geography; Statistics; Forest management; Agroforestry; Laser; Ecology; Archaeology; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00152337,0.0001873603,0.0003320419,0.0002850303,0.0003376154,0.0001287089,0.0009562232,0.000113513,0.0001276815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000288794,0.0001535617,0.0001036389,0.000958589,0.0008339435,0.0006043434,0.0002495174,0.0004705147,0.00004067153],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005457018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002856065,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01708085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00419106,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970024,0.0001723371,0.0006380352,0.0003820246,0.001304077,0.0005010924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980122,0.0001970217,0.0004273912,0.0009082553,0.0001233638,0.0003317648],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006715492,0.0004691952,0.4793739,0.00008489571,0.0001327843,0.0001964318,0.001035769,0.4846247,0.01872106,0.0002852368,0.001216538,0.0131879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002571173,0.0006259119,0.6441922,0.001070365,0.0001213961,0.0001094994,0.0006155148,0.3146435,0.02164901,0.01345589,0.0004989214,0.0004466242],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9744269,0.00007992113,0.02425525,0.0004612159,0.0001168599,0.0002425643,0.0001349729,0.00001075034,0.000271537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734417,0.00000880565,0.02626835,0.0000101047,0.0001017565,9.927384e-7,0.0001054336,0.00003328796,0.00002953974],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1699812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9894645,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06229634101437313,"score_gpt":0.3572649766072241,"score_spread":0.2949686355928509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}