{"id":"W1967029443","doi":"10.1080/14649357.2012.649947","title":"Achieving Legitimacy Through Deliberative Plan-Making Processes—Lessons for Metropolitan Strategic Planning","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory & Practice","topic":"Urban Planning and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Melbourne","keywords":"Legitimacy; Democratic legitimacy; Metropolitan area; Planner; Stakeholder; Plan (archaeology); Political science; Deliberative democracy; Public administration; Process (computing); Perspective (graphical); Democracy; Public relations; Sociology; Process management; Business; Politics; Geography; Law; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004730152,0.0003714846,0.0004040325,0.0001068297,0.00229877,0.0004768275,0.0005490179,0.0002131233,0.00005425936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01286894,0.0003695822,0.0001106733,0.0005642189,0.000301545,0.004075586,0.00008075652,0.0006396182,0.00004950133],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003983283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005419781,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000458046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002458489,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995973,0.001067417,0.0004343758,0.0005125133,0.0006496114,0.001363073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866189,0.01175102,0.0007658293,0.0003037667,0.0003369972,0.0002235299],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008520253,0.0002229988,0.005902585,0.0001157066,0.0002515954,0.00004356401,0.1569598,0.0004316323,0.0001016994,0.8302622,0.004404972,0.0004512246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008176528,0.0002243949,0.0009774002,0.001066761,0.0005073427,0.00008674005,0.3538553,0.00009330391,0.0002012352,0.04875651,0.592241,0.001172409],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08367008,0.0227517,0.08406702,0.007979305,0.00209075,0.001503341,0.0002324026,0.001057255,0.7966481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9750565,0.00005998201,0.01973007,0.001545143,0.001826138,0.0001216299,0.00003910967,0.00006907576,0.001552344],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8913864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998756,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1390237806867967,"score_gpt":0.4362005730791422,"score_spread":0.2971767923923455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}