{"id":"W1967029443","doi":"10.1080/14649357.2012.649947","title":"Achieving Legitimacy Through Deliberative Plan-Making Processes—Lessons for Metropolitan Strategic Planning","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Planning Theory & Practice","topic":"Urban Planning and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Melbourne","keywords":"Legitimacy; Democratic legitimacy; Metropolitan area; Planner; Stakeholder; Plan (archaeology); Political science; Deliberative democracy; Public administration; Process (computing); Perspective (graphical); Democracy; Public relations; Sociology; Process management; Business; Politics; Geography; Law; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01884589,0.0005298016,0.0005430942,0.001457767,0.006807602,0.01413347,0.002098005,0.003127708,0.004341288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03167719,0.0004944837,0.0006073375,0.001583653,0.04163563,0.01267055,0.01039728,0.005120196,0.0006085734],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01046983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01667581,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0136942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0166015,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9868377,0.009779527,0.000301254,0.0006681991,0.001389894,0.001023426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9760432,0.01642155,0.0009624324,0.003352108,0.001829092,0.001391642],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001504164,0.0000297201,0.000697985,0.00008827738,0.000009157252,0.0001316255,0.01637401,0.003829186,0.0001596168,0.9527974,0.001052433,0.02481552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001721309,0.00001725194,0.0003289855,0.0001646842,0.000005389494,0.00004070281,0.007651615,0.004286109,0.0003465306,0.9557737,0.03135505,0.00001276714],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1733832,0.002768916,0.4454901,0.06988734,0.0002472592,0.0004640804,0.00005258224,0.0003888179,0.3073177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9532288,0.0006848306,0.04095838,0.000321241,0.00003579209,0.0001663834,0.00002363492,0.00007432508,0.004506635],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01884589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09966779,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1390237806867967,"score_gpt":0.4362005730791422,"score_spread":0.2971767923923455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}