{"id":"W1967094773","doi":"10.1007/s10784-010-9119-5","title":"High level Antarctic EIA under the Madrid Protocol: state practice and the effectiveness of the Comprehensive Environmental Evaluation process","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Environmental Agreements Politics Law and Economics","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre; Shaanxi Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine","keywords":"Scrutiny; Jurisdiction; Antarctic treaty; Treaty; Context (archaeology); Montreal Protocol; Notice; Protocol (science); Environmental impact assessment; Political science; Veto; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; International law; Subject (documents); Environmental protection; Law; Environmental science; Geography; Computer science; Library science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007910753,0.0002138119,0.0001620302,0.00001555335,0.0003334625,0.00009050811,0.0004883518,0.00005627336,0.0006619489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003450939,0.0001315903,0.00006186913,0.00002051369,0.002090971,0.0004440968,0.0006428168,0.0002631079,0.0000404226],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003207418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001379664,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001543861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000205481,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983057,0.0002761822,0.0003672684,0.0003385301,0.0004955539,0.0002167671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998749,0.0005928769,0.0003012741,0.0002851351,0.00001211998,0.00005963076],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002098435,0.001592482,0.1658648,0.0001189631,0.001424563,0.000005199269,0.002199979,0.02707961,0.02722536,0.7688289,0.0001176399,0.003444107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006690905,0.0001138754,0.8155812,0.00004499926,0.000194215,0.0001259321,0.0008687608,0.009219165,0.01534293,0.1288921,0.02248811,0.0004377698],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9844688,0.000009179264,0.00002024698,0.001498231,0.0003297997,0.008055481,0.0002402159,0.000004925038,0.005373092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951102,0.00002712586,0.0001493624,0.002097524,0.00006715715,0.002251069,0.00004039917,0.00001968703,0.0002374901],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6497164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7704268,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01037464618844606,"score_gpt":0.2606563343651284,"score_spread":0.2502816881766823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}