{"id":"W1967146471","doi":"10.1139/s02-023","title":"Comparing crushed recycled glass to silica sand for dual media filtration","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science","topic":"Fecal contamination and water quality","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Filtration (mathematics); Anthracite; Filter (signal processing); Materials science; Particle size; Particle (ecology); Glass recycling; Composite material; Mineralogy; Chemistry; Waste management; Chemical engineering; Geology; Coal; Engineering; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006408658,0.0005136981,0.0004496345,0.0006066912,0.0004110282,0.0009469421,0.0004358298,0.0005210618,0.0009541597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000980238,0.0002236261,0.0004727703,0.0003363587,0.0004041961,0.0005113766,0.0004620426,0.0003436817,0.0002438224],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000993804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008338256,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02083482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03679848,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993698,0.00008885442,0.00004543419,0.0001242801,0.000291942,0.00007968603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993326,0.0002224847,0.0001301361,0.00004552054,0.0001809647,0.00008826642],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005258296,0.0001168345,0.004576749,0.0001784615,0.00003024922,0.00008024335,0.00007394909,0.0005390138,0.98506,0.0000314905,0.00002804573,0.008759207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000247877,0.002666661,0.02400786,0.00001301227,0.00006272253,0.000172527,0.0001073867,0.001433402,0.9705971,0.00001638288,0.000877636,0.00002051561],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975545,0.0003941137,0.001546073,0.00002155688,0.00001329472,0.00003550687,0.00003788272,0.00002491387,0.0003720778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889504,0.0006705501,0.007779958,0.00003396341,0.00001211113,0.00002232408,0.0002426474,0.00001866843,0.002269299],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02083482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04142708,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02161397211479094,"score_gpt":0.2151019914231453,"score_spread":0.1934880193083544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}