{"id":"W1967146471","doi":"10.1139/s02-023","title":"Comparing crushed recycled glass to silica sand for dual media filtration","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science","topic":"Fecal contamination and water quality","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Filtration (mathematics); Anthracite; Filter (signal processing); Materials science; Particle size; Particle (ecology); Glass recycling; Composite material; Mineralogy; Chemistry; Waste management; Chemical engineering; Geology; Coal; Engineering; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005102396,0.00008560239,0.0001265114,0.00006541303,0.0001135663,0.00004994056,0.0001379306,0.00002362776,0.0001952411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001076611,0.00007377212,0.00003403002,0.0001244194,0.0001312623,0.0003635139,0.0000650268,0.0000710923,0.00001290579],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001412572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000223189,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004844091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001922079,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990614,0.00001127124,0.0002409104,0.0001542275,0.000351851,0.0001803138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995642,0.00007028245,0.00007213889,0.00007615916,0.00000390352,0.0002132637],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003519936,0.0001288345,0.01211139,0.000008941388,0.000007398342,0.000006415412,0.00191502,0.01195903,0.9557526,0.0001310248,0.0007242474,0.01721996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001311166,0.0004797263,0.6910986,0.00004173913,0.00002299339,0.0001094648,0.0001871359,0.2459815,0.05041461,0.0001046453,0.009857917,0.0003904528],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934859,0.00003613501,0.005632457,0.0002755237,0.0001553382,0.00007092731,0.000003443348,0.000007463776,0.000332773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964995,0.00001671038,0.003229137,0.0001103066,0.00004270226,0.00000266114,4.416076e-7,0.000005108957,0.00009345786],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9053379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.300834,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02161397211479094,"score_gpt":0.2151019914231453,"score_spread":0.1934880193083544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}