{"id":"W1967241139","doi":"10.1037/h0087417","title":"Another look at the effect of a surprising intervening event on negative priming.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale","topic":"Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Priming (agriculture); Surprise; Event (particle physics); Repetition (rhetorical device); Cognitive psychology; Negative priming; Social psychology; Event-related potential; Cognition; Neuroscience; Selective attention; Physics; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008805676,0.0005913207,0.00082252,0.0004601578,0.0003974065,0.0006855838,0.0008586559,0.001060432,0.01582277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004617995,0.0002672725,0.0007297276,0.0002484825,0.001453893,0.001061669,0.000823505,0.00364746,0.0007666126],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003253803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002422465,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001124248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009046363,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995435,0.00009544751,0.00003593479,0.00008878294,0.0001628732,0.00007342529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929703,0.005713364,0.0003149913,0.0003967024,0.0002343016,0.0003703538],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005183131,0.001207742,0.002133442,0.0009240124,0.000227059,0.001022587,0.0007481083,0.0002970892,0.9667048,0.001914406,0.00144297,0.01819468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001191974,0.02871207,0.3021065,0.0002705233,0.001620648,0.007213907,0.0009757055,0.004968035,0.6176323,0.01283308,0.02226138,0.0002139302],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9114075,0.003383185,0.01958451,0.003882061,0.00116698,0.0003185872,0.001055286,0.001120065,0.05808185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781277,0.000780543,0.00755397,0.003567852,0.0002269729,0.0001243251,0.0003295192,0.0004342737,0.008854893],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01582277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05293244,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09978012671722072,"score_gpt":0.3727429737084311,"score_spread":0.2729628469912103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}